Comparison Overview

TechGuardian

VS

LA Fitness

TechGuardian

Melbourne, VIC, AU, 3150
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.techguardian.net

Welcome to TechGuardian - My mission is 1) To help parents understand the negative health consequences of screens and wireless radiation on their children and 2) teach them simple ways to mitigate these so that we can safely live with the tech that has become such a large part of our lives.

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

LA Fitness

PO Box 55088, Irvine, California, 92619, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lafitness.com

LA Fitness is a privately owned fitness club chain. LA Fitness has hundreds of health clubs gyms and millions of members across US and Canada. In an industry often equated with fad and fashion, LA Fitness has steadily increased its presence by focusing on the one lifelong benefit valued by everyone: good health. Established in Southern California in 1984, LA Fitness continues to seek innovative ways to enhance the wellbeing of its members. Today, LA Fitness’ state-of-the-art clubs span the continent and continue to expand. LA Fitness’ strong and successful growth stems from its commitment to understanding and meeting the distinct needs of each community it serves. With a wide range of amenities and a highly trained staff, LA Fitness can provide fun and effective workout options to family members of all ages and interests. Website - http://www.lafitness.com Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/LAFitness Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/LAFitness Google+ - https://plus.google.com/+lafitness YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/lafitness

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 14,288
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/techguardian.jpeg
TechGuardian
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/la-fitness.jpeg
LA Fitness
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TechGuardian
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LA Fitness
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TechGuardian in 2025.

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LA Fitness in 2025.

Incident History — TechGuardian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TechGuardian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LA Fitness (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LA Fitness cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/techguardian.jpeg
TechGuardian
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Spear-phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/la-fitness.jpeg
LA Fitness
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LA Fitness company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TechGuardian company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TechGuardian company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas LA Fitness company has not reported any.

In the current year, LA Fitness company and TechGuardian company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LA Fitness company nor TechGuardian company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

TechGuardian company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other LA Fitness company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither LA Fitness company nor TechGuardian company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TechGuardian company nor LA Fitness company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TechGuardian nor LA Fitness holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TechGuardian company nor LA Fitness company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LA Fitness company employs more people globally than TechGuardian company, reflecting its scale as a Wellness and Fitness Services.

Neither TechGuardian nor LA Fitness holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TechGuardian nor LA Fitness holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TechGuardian nor LA Fitness holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TechGuardian nor LA Fitness holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TechGuardian nor LA Fitness holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TechGuardian nor LA Fitness holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server, Remote Desktop Manager on Windows.This issue affects Devolutions Server: through 2025.3.8.0; Remote Desktop Manager: through 2025.3.23.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Reveals plaintext credentials in the MONITOR command vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from 1.0.0 through 2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from v2.9.0 through v2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References