Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Team UniversalTeam Universal
VS
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRCInternational Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC
Team Universal

Team Universal

N/A

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile

Team Universal are bringing back the fun! We want to raise as much money as possible to help support the incredible work at The Prince’s Trust through innovative, diverse and engaging events. With the possibility to bring together large-scale events, we’re bringing bac...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

19, avenue de la Paix, Geneva, Geneva, CH, 1202

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://careers.icrc.org/
780/1000Fair

Established in 1863, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) works worldwide to provide humanitarian help for people affected by conflict and armed violence and to promote the laws that protect victims of war. An independent and neutral organization, its man...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:13,847
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Team Universal

Team Universal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Team Universal in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Team Universal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Team Universal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Team Universal

Team Universal

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
INT14030723

FAQ

Between Team Universal company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Team Universal company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Team Universal company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Team Universal company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Team Universal company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Team Universal company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Team Universal company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Team Universal company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Team Universal company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Team Universal company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Team Universal company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Team Universal and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Team Universal and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Team Universal or International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Team Universal or International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC ?
Between Team Universal and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Team Universal and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1