Comparison Overview
The Energy Authority

The Energy Authority
1301 Riverplace Blvd, Suite 2700, Jacksonville, Florida, US, 32207
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The Energy Authority (TEA®) is the strategic partner of choice in providing energy solutions to public power. We are wholly-owned and directed by our public power Members who participate in our organization's decision-making. Today, over 80 public power utilities acros...

Correos
Calle del Conde de Peñalver, 19, Madrid, 28006, ES
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Somos la empresa líder en comunicaciones físicas, digitales y de paquetería. Nuestra misión es prestar un servicio integral de calidad, ofreciendo soluciones y servicios en toda la cadena de valor del ecommerce con el objetivo de facilitar la vida a nuestros clientes. D...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

The Energy Authority







Correos






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The Energy Authority in 2026.
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Correos in 2026.
Incident History - The Energy Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The Energy Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Correos (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Correos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

The Energy Authority

Correos
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.