Comparison Overview
TD SYNNEX Netherlands

TD SYNNEX Netherlands
Tolnasingel 2, Bodegraven, Zuid Holland, 2411 PV, NL
Last Update: 07/03/2026
Als een innovatieve partner zien wij het als onze taak ervoor te zorgen dat onze ruim 150.000 klanten in meer dan 100 landen de waarde van hun technologische investeringen maximaliseren, bedrijfsresultaten behalen en groeimogelijkheden ontsluiten. De hoofdkantoren van ...

GFT Technologies
Schelmenwasenstr. 34, Stuttgart, 70567, DE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
GFT Technologies is an AI-centric global digital transformation company. We design advanced data and AI transformation solutions, modernize technology architectures and develop next-generation core systems for industry leaders in Banking, Insurance, Manufacturing and Ro...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

TD SYNNEX Netherlands







GFT Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TD SYNNEX Netherlands in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GFT Technologies in 2026.
Incident History - TD SYNNEX Netherlands (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TD SYNNEX Netherlands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - GFT Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GFT Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

TD SYNNEX Netherlands

GFT Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.