Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TD SYNNEX JapanTD SYNNEX Japan
VS
SONDASONDA
TD SYNNEX Japan

TD SYNNEX Japan

3-1-1 Shibaura, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0023, JP

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://jp.tdsynnex.com/
755/1000Fair

TD SYNNEXは、世界トップクラスのITディストリビューターおよび ソリューションアグリゲーターです。 当社は魅力あるテクノロジー製品、サービス、ソリューションを世界に提供するという揺るぎない情熱を共有する22,000人のIT人材が在籍しています。 当社は、顧客がITへの投資価値を最大化し、ビジネスの効果を示し、成長機会を引き出せるように支援する革新的なパートナーを目指します。

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:103
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SONDA

SONDA

Teatinos 500, Santiago, CL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sonda.com
794/1000Fair

We are at the forefront of digital transformation in the Americas, positively impacting the lives of over 500 million people. As a key player in emerging industries, we drive innovation and change through ambitious modernization projects and cutting-edge solutions. By u...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:14,805
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TD SYNNEX Japan

TD SYNNEX Japan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SONDA

SONDA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TD SYNNEX Japan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SONDA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TD SYNNEX Japan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TD SYNNEX Japan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SONDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SONDA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TD SYNNEX Japan

TD SYNNEX Japan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SONDA

SONDA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TD SYNNEX Japan company and SONDA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan company and SONDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan company and SONDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan company and SONDA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan company and SONDA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan company and SONDA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan company and SONDA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan and SONDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan and SONDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TD SYNNEX Japan or SONDA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TD SYNNEX Japan or SONDA ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan and SONDA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TD SYNNEX Japan and SONDA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1