Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TDK-MicronasTDK-Micronas
VS
KLAKLA
TDK-Micronas

TDK-Micronas

Hans-Bunte-Str. 19, Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Württemberg, 79108, DE

Last Update: 03/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.micronas.tdk.com
756/1000Fair

With over 25 years of in-house manufacturing experience, our team has perfected the production of sensors and actuators to ensure operational excellence. We were also the first company to integrate a Hall-effect based sensor into CMOS technology in 1993, and since then,...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:438
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
KLA

KLA

3 Technology Dr, Milpitas, 95035, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.kla.com
835/1000Good

KLA develops industry-leading equipment and services that enable innovation throughout the electronics industry. We provide advanced process control and process-enabling solutions for manufacturing wafers and reticles, integrated circuits, packaging and printed circuit ...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:16,217
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TDK-Micronas

TDK-Micronas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KLA

KLA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TDK-Micronas in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KLA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TDK-Micronas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TDK-Micronas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KLA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KLA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TDK-Micronas

TDK-Micronas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
KLA

KLA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TDK-Micronas company and KLA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TDK-Micronas company and KLA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TDK-Micronas company and KLA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TDK-Micronas company and KLA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TDK-Micronas company and KLA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TDK-Micronas company and KLA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TDK-Micronas company and KLA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TDK-Micronas company and KLA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TDK-Micronas company and KLA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TDK-Micronas company and KLA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TDK-Micronas company and KLA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TDK-Micronas and KLA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TDK-Micronas and KLA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TDK-Micronas or KLA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TDK-Micronas or KLA ?
Between TDK-Micronas and KLA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TDK-Micronas and KLA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3