Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tata Consultancy Services - JapanTata Consultancy Services - Japan
VS
Orange BusinessOrange Business
Tata Consultancy Services - Japan

Tata Consultancy Services - Japan

港区, 106-0041, JP

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tcs.com/jp-ja
755/1000Fair

タタコンサルタンシーサービシズは、世界の様々な業界を牽引する大手企業からデジタル変革およびテクノロジーパートナーに選ばれています。1968年の創業以来、最高水準のイノベーション、卓越したエンジニアリング、カスタマーサービスを提供してきました。 タタ・グループの伝統を礎とするTCSは、お客さま、投資家、従業員、そして地域社会に長期的な価値を創造することに注力しています。世界55カ国に高度スキル人材を擁し、202カ所のサービスデリバリーセンターを有するTCSは、世界各地でトップ・エンプロイヤーに認定されており、新技術を迅速に適用・拡張す...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Orange Business

Orange Business

La Plaine Saint Denis, Paris, FR, 93457 Cedex

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
781/1000Fair

At Orange Business, our ambition is to become the leading european Network and Digital Integrator by leveraging our proven expertise in next-generation connectivity solutions, the cloud and cybersecurity. Our 30,000 women and men are present in 65 countries, where ever...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:28,510
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tata Consultancy Services - Japan

Tata Consultancy Services - Japan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Orange Business

Orange Business

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Consultancy Services - Japan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orange Business in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tata Consultancy Services - Japan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Consultancy Services - Japan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Orange Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tata Consultancy Services - Japan

Tata Consultancy Services - Japan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Orange Business

Orange Business

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ORA957082125

FAQ

Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan company and Orange Business company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan company and Orange Business company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan company and Orange Business company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan company and Orange Business company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan company and Orange Business company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan company and Orange Business company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan company and Orange Business company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan company and Orange Business company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan company and Orange Business company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan company and Orange Business company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan company and Orange Business company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan and Orange Business, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan and Orange Business, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tata Consultancy Services - Japan or Orange Business ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tata Consultancy Services - Japan or Orange Business ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan and Orange Business, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - Japan and Orange Business, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1