Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHDTBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD
VS
dentsudentsu
TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD

TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD

N/A

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tbwa.com.my
800/1000Good

Awesome place to be coz we have a boss like Mr Austen Zecha. Love the way he is.....REAL , no bullshits and direct. I idolize his crazy ways and having someone to look up to in the same office is god sent. This may sound like im balls polishing but you gotta meet him to...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:10
Subsidiaries:75
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
dentsu

dentsu

1-8-1 Higashi-shimbashi, Tokyo, JP

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://bit.ly/3lDa6Ff
667/1000Weak

We are dentsu. We team together to help brands predict and plan for disruptive future opportunities and create new paths to growth in the sustainable economy. We know people better than anyone else and we use those insights to connect brand, content, commerce and experi...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:19,113
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD

TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
dentsu

dentsu

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dentsu in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - dentsu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dentsu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD

TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
dentsu

dentsu

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEN1492114110225
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEN0962609112125

FAQ

Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD company and dentsu company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD company and dentsu company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD company and dentsu company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD company and dentsu company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD company and dentsu company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD company and dentsu company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD company and dentsu company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD company and dentsu company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD company and dentsu company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD company and dentsu company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD company and dentsu company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD and dentsu, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD and dentsu, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD or dentsu ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD or dentsu ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD and dentsu, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TBWA-ISC MALAYSIA SDN BHD and dentsu, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2