Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TAURA Consultoria e RepresentaçõesTAURA Consultoria e Representações
VS
PING ANPING AN
TAURA Consultoria e Representações

TAURA Consultoria e Representações

CP 17023, São Paulo, 02340970, BR

Last Update: 18/03/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.taurabr.com
646/1000Poor

TAURA is specialized in worldwide financial, political, and Economic information services for the Latin American market, offering international solutions with local support. Taura team is composed of professionals with more than 25 years of experience in the Financial ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
PING AN

PING AN

No. 5033 Yitian Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518046, CN

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://group.pingan.com/
830/1000Good

This is the official Company Page of Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. (HKEx: 2318; SSE: 601318; ADR: PNGAY). Ping An strives to become a world leading technology-powered financial services group. We believe the way people receive financial services an...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:51,286
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TAURA Consultoria e Representações

TAURA Consultoria e Representações

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PING AN

PING AN

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

TAURA Consultoria e Representações has 42.86% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PING AN in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TAURA Consultoria e Representações (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TAURA Consultoria e Representações cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PING AN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PING AN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TAURA Consultoria e Representações

TAURA Consultoria e Representações

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TAU1773845367
PING AN

PING AN

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações company and PING AN company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações company and PING AN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações company and PING AN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações company and PING AN company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações company and PING AN company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações company and PING AN company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações company and PING AN company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações and PING AN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações and PING AN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TAURA Consultoria e Representações or PING AN ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TAURA Consultoria e Representações or PING AN ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações and PING AN, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TAURA Consultoria e Representações and PING AN, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9