Comparison Overview

Tate

VS

Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium

Tate

Millbank, London, England, SW1P 4RG, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Our mission is to increase the public’s enjoyment and understanding of art. When Tate first opened its doors to the public in 1897 it had just one gallery, displaying a small collection of British artworks. Today we have four major galleries and the national collection of British art from 1500 to the present day and international modern and contemporary art, which includes nearly 80,000 artworks. Tate is a public institution owned by, and existing for, the public.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 1,669
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium

3450 Ortiz Avenue, Fort Myers, FL, 33905, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Calusa Nature Center is a non-profit organization that seeks to educate the public on wildlife, rehabilitated wildlife, water conservation, and other nature-related conservation and education. The nature center has programs for adults and children and is seeking to expand and update the musuem, exhibits, animal exhibits, planetarium, add other community activities and increase community involvement. The nature center is in dire need of volunteers and donations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tate.jpeg
Tate
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/calusa-nature-center.jpeg
Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tate
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tate in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium in 2025.

Incident History — Tate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tate.jpeg
Tate
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/calusa-nature-center.jpeg
Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tate company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tate company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company has not reported any.

In the current year, Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company and Tate company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company nor Tate company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Tate company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company nor Tate company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tate company nor Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tate nor Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tate company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company.

Tate company employs more people globally than Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Tate nor Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tate nor Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tate nor Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tate nor Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tate nor Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tate nor Calusa Nature Center and Planetarium holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X