Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Our mission is to increase the public’s enjoyment and understanding of art. When Tate first opened its doors to the public in 1897 it had just one gallery, displaying a small collection of British artworks. Today we have four major galleries and the national collection of British art from 1500 to the present day and international modern and contemporary art, which includes nearly 80,000 artworks. Tate is a public institution owned by, and existing for, the public.

Tate A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Tate

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

tate

Employees number:

1,669

Number of followers:

204,680

NAICS:

712

Industry Type:

Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos

Homepage:

tate.org.uk

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

TAT_2668430

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreTate Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tate.jpeg
Tate Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreTate Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tate.jpeg
Tate Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Tate Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
TateBreach60310/2023NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Personal details of 111 job applicants for a website developer role at Tate art galleries (including Tate Modern, Tate Britain, Tate St Ives, and Tate Liverpool) were leaked online in October 2023. The exposed data spanning hundreds of pages included sensitive information such as home addresses, current and past salaries, employer details, education history, referees' names, personal email addresses, and mobile numbers. The breach was discovered when a referee of one applicant (Max Kohler) was contacted by a stranger who found the data on an unrelated public website. The leak, attributed to potential staff mishandling or process errors, did not involve a cyberattack or ransomware but stemmed from internal negligence. The incident underscores systemic failures in data protection, with Tate denying a system breach while investigating the matter. The UK’s ICO mandates reporting such breaches within 72 hours if they risk individuals' rights, highlighting rising trends in accidental data exposures across organizations.

Tate
Breach
Severity: 60
Impact: 3
Seen: 10/2023
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Personal details of 111 job applicants for a website developer role at Tate art galleries (including Tate Modern, Tate Britain, Tate St Ives, and Tate Liverpool) were leaked online in October 2023. The exposed data spanning hundreds of pages included sensitive information such as home addresses, current and past salaries, employer details, education history, referees' names, personal email addresses, and mobile numbers. The breach was discovered when a referee of one applicant (Max Kohler) was contacted by a stranger who found the data on an unrelated public website. The leak, attributed to potential staff mishandling or process errors, did not involve a cyberattack or ransomware but stemmed from internal negligence. The incident underscores systemic failures in data protection, with Tate denying a system breach while investigating the matter. The UK’s ICO mandates reporting such breaches within 72 hours if they risk individuals' rights, highlighting rising trends in accidental data exposures across organizations.

Ailogo

Tate Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for Tate

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tate in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tate in 2026.

Incident Types Tate vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tate in 2026.

Incident History — Tate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Tate Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Our mission is to increase the public’s enjoyment and understanding of art. When Tate first opened its doors to the public in 1897 it had just one gallery, displaying a small collection of British artworks. Today we have four major galleries and the national collection of British art from 1500 to the present day and international modern and contemporary art, which includes nearly 80,000 artworks. Tate is a public institution owned by, and existing for, the public.

Loading...
similarCompanies

Tate Similar Companies

Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam

Botanic garden, founded in 1638 (which Linkedin does not accept as possible founding year, probably we're too old for the digital age..). The Hortus houses more than 4,000 different species of plants, which is about 2% of all plant species growing on Earth. The Hortus closely cooperates with other b

American Textile History Museum

It is with a heavy heart that we inform you that due to a significant financial deficit, the American Textile History Museum has closed our doors to the public. Over the next year, we will seek to find new homes for our collection. We are gratefully accepting donations to help preserve and protect t

SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

Art transforms lives. It provokes us to think, to express, to explore our own creativity, to envision new possibilities. SFMOMA expanded the museum to provide a better experience for our visitors and a better home for our expanding collections, including the SFMOMA collection and the Fisher Collecti

New England Aquarium

The New England Aquarium is a catalyst for global change through public engagement, commitment to marine animal conservation, leadership in education, innovative scientific research, and effective advocacy for vital and vibrant oceans. It is the only Boston-based cultural institution with a mission

Hillwood Estate, Museum & Gardens

Hillwood's mission is to delight and engage visitors with an experience inspired by the life of our founder, Marjorie Merriweather Post, and her passion for excellence, gracious hospitality, art, history, and gardens. As a female business trailblazer, Marjorie Merriweather Post had extremely high

Anchorage Museum

The Anchorage Museum shares the art, history, culture, and stories of Alaska and the North from diverse perspectives through exhibitions, public programs, and community projects focused on people, place, planet and potential. Located in Anchorage, Alaska, the museum sits on the traditional homeland

Lucas Museum of Narrative Art

The Lucas Museum of Narrative Art's mission is to inspire and connect people through the exploration of visual stories and their influences in society. Co-founded by George Lucas and Mellody Hobson, the Lucas Museum was designed by renowned architect Ma Yansong of MAD Architects with Stantec as exe

The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City

The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City's mission is to spark a lifelong love of learning through the universal and uniting power of play. Wonderscope is the KC region’s only fully accessible, non-profit children’s museum dedicated to providing STEAM – Science, Technology, E

Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens

Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens is the former estate of the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company co-founder F.A. Seiberling, and his family. In 1957, Stan Hywet became a non-profit historic estate museum so that the public could benefit from the cultural, educational, and inspirational riches of one of the most

newsone

Tate CyberSecurity News

January 02, 2026 09:04 PM
Fears vital services could be at risk in Cheltenham as half of councillors not keeping up with cyber security training

There are serious concerns vital council services in Gloucestershire could be disrupted once again by hackers because councillors are not keeping up with...

December 05, 2025 08:00 AM
Chinese hackers reportedly targeting government entities using 'Brickstorm' malware

Hackers with links to China reportedly successfully infiltrated a number of unnamed government and tech entities using advanced malware.

December 04, 2025 08:00 AM
News - Innovation and Collaboration Power ASNE 2025 Intelligent Ships Symposium

Photo By Sgt. Najee Tate Milton | Hosted by the American Society of Naval Engineers (ASNE) in Philadelphia from Aug....... read more read...

November 21, 2025 08:00 AM
Same attacks, more pain: Cyber security face up to exponential threats

Despite headlines about exponential escalation in the cyber attacks on governments and corporation, an expert says the core threats have...

November 19, 2025 08:00 AM
Local cybersecurity firm acquired as businesses face more cybercrime risks

Amplix acquired Coral Springs firm 24By7Security to expand tech advisory services and help clients combat rising data breach risks.

November 14, 2025 08:00 AM
Personal details of Tate galleries job applicants leaked online

Personal details submitted by applicants for a job at Tate art galleries have been leaked online, exposing their addresses, salaries and the...

October 28, 2025 07:00 AM
PSA: X users have until November 10 to re-enroll their security keys

If you're a former Twitter user still using X and rely on a hardware security key for your two-factor authentication (2FA) method,...

October 28, 2025 07:00 AM
Google is once again disputing Gmail was breached

The company insists its 'defenses are strong' after misinterpretation of a stolen data leak.

October 10, 2025 07:00 AM
Rust College partners with Cisco, MCITy to train cybersecurity workforce

HOLLY SPRINGS, Miss. — Rust College has launched a new cybersecurity workforce training program in partnership with the Mississippi Center...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

Tate CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Tate

The official website of Tate is http://www.tate.org.uk.

Tate’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Tate’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 731, reflecting their Moderate security posture.

How many security badges does Tate’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Tate currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Tate been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Tate has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Tate have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Tate is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Tate have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Tate does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Tate comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Tate is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Tate have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Tate does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Tate comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Tate is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Tate have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Tate is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Tate

Tate operates primarily in the Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos industry.

Number of Employees at Tate

Tate employs approximately 1,669 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Tate

Tate presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Tate’s LinkedIn Followers

Tate’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 204,680 followers.

NAICS Classification of Tate

Tate is classified under the NAICS code 712, which corresponds to Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions.

Tate’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Tate does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Tate’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Tate maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tate.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Tate

As of January 22, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Tate has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Tate has an estimated 2,178 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Tate ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

How does Tate detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with under investigation (tate statement), and remediation measures with data takedown requested (per applicant demand), and communication strategy with limited public statement; no apology issued yet..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Unintentional Disclosure)

Title: Tate Art Galleries Job Applicant Data Leak

Description: Personal details of 111 job applicants for a website developer position at Tate art galleries (including Tate Modern, Tate Britain, Tate St Ives, and Tate Liverpool) were leaked online. The exposed data includes addresses, salaries, referee contact details (names, phone numbers, email addresses), current employers, education history, and application answers. The leak was discovered in October 2023 when a referee of one applicant was contacted by a stranger who found the data online. The cause is suspected to be a staff or process error, not a system breach.

Date Detected: 2023-10-05

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-10-05

Type: Data Breach (Unintentional Disclosure)

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Unintentional Disclosure) TAT3402734111525

Data Compromised: Personal addresses, Salaries, Referee names, Referee phone numbers, Referee email addresses, Current employer details, Education history, Job application answers

Customer Complaints: At least one reported case (Max Kohler)

Brand Reputation Impact: Negative (public criticism, loss of trust in data handling)

Legal Liabilities: Potential (ICO investigation pending)

Identity Theft Risk: High (sensitive personal and financial data exposed)

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Employment History, Salary Data, Referee Contact Details, Application Responses and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Unintentional Disclosure) TAT3402734111525

Entity Name: Tate Galleries

Entity Type: Non-profit Art Organization

Industry: Arts & Culture

Location: London, UK (with branches in Cornwall and Liverpool)

Customers Affected: 111 job applicants

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Unintentional Disclosure) TAT3402734111525

Incident Response Plan Activated: Under investigation (Tate statement)

Remediation Measures: Data takedown requested (per applicant demand)

Communication Strategy: Limited public statement; no apology issued yet

What is the company's incident response plan?

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Under investigation (Tate statement).

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach (Unintentional Disclosure) TAT3402734111525

Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Employment history, Salary data, Referee contact details, Application responses

Number of Records Exposed: 111 individuals

Sensitivity of Data: High (includes salaries, addresses, and private contact details)

Data Exfiltration: Yes (published on unrelated website)

File Types Exposed: Application documents (likely PDFs or text files)

Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (addresses, phone numbers, emails, employment details)

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Data takedown requested (per applicant demand).

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Unintentional Disclosure) TAT3402734111525

Regulations Violated: Potential violation of UK GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)

Legal Actions: ICO investigation pending (72-hour breach notification rule applies)

Regulatory Notifications: Not confirmed (Tate claims no breach of systems)

How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through ICO investigation pending (72-hour breach notification rule applies).

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Data Breach (Unintentional Disclosure) TAT3402734111525

Recommendations: Implement stricter data handling protocols for job applications, Conduct staff training on data protection (e.g., GDPR compliance), Establish clear breach response procedures, Public apology and transparency report (per applicant demand), Regular audits of third-party vendors handling sensitive dataImplement stricter data handling protocols for job applications, Conduct staff training on data protection (e.g., GDPR compliance), Establish clear breach response procedures, Public apology and transparency report (per applicant demand), Regular audits of third-party vendors handling sensitive dataImplement stricter data handling protocols for job applications, Conduct staff training on data protection (e.g., GDPR compliance), Establish clear breach response procedures, Public apology and transparency report (per applicant demand), Regular audits of third-party vendors handling sensitive dataImplement stricter data handling protocols for job applications, Conduct staff training on data protection (e.g., GDPR compliance), Establish clear breach response procedures, Public apology and transparency report (per applicant demand), Regular audits of third-party vendors handling sensitive dataImplement stricter data handling protocols for job applications, Conduct staff training on data protection (e.g., GDPR compliance), Establish clear breach response procedures, Public apology and transparency report (per applicant demand), Regular audits of third-party vendors handling sensitive data

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Unintentional Disclosure) TAT3402734111525

Source: The Guardian

URL: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/oct/06/tate-job-applicants-personal-details-leaked-online

Date Accessed: 2023-10-06

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: The GuardianUrl: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/oct/06/tate-job-applicants-personal-details-leaked-onlineDate Accessed: 2023-10-06.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Unintentional Disclosure) TAT3402734111525

Investigation Status: Ongoing (Tate internal review; ICO may investigate)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Limited public statement; no apology issued yet.

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Unintentional Disclosure) TAT3402734111525

Root Causes: Suspected staff/process error (e.g., misconfigured file sharing, accidental upload to public site)

Additional Questions

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2023-10-05.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2023-10-05.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal addresses, Salaries, Referee names, Referee phone numbers, Referee email addresses, Current employer details, Education history, Job application answers and .

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Referee names, Referee email addresses, Education history, Personal addresses, Salaries, Current employer details, Job application answers and Referee phone numbers.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 111.0.

Regulatory Compliance

What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was ICO investigation pending (72-hour breach notification rule applies).

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Implement stricter data handling protocols for job applications, Regular audits of third-party vendors handling sensitive data, Establish clear breach response procedures, Conduct staff training on data protection (e.g., GDPR compliance) and Public apology and transparency report (per applicant demand).

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is The Guardian.

What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/oct/06/tate-job-applicants-personal-details-leaked-online .

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (Tate internal review; ICO may investigate).

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=tate' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge