Tate-access-floors vs Skanska - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Comparison Overview

Tate

Skanska

Tate

7510 Montevideo Rd, Jessup, MD, 20794, US

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www.tateinc.com

754/1000Fair

Tate’s access floor and underfloor service distribution solution is one of the best strategies for achieving high performance, sustainable commercial and data center environments. In a commercial building such as an office, airport, library, classroom or lab, this stra...

NAICS:23

NAICS Definition:Construction

Employees:518

Subsidiaries:5

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Skanska

Warfvinges väg 25 (Group Headquarters), Stockholm, SE, SE-112 74

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www.skanska.com

782/1000Fair

Skanska Group uses knowledge & foresight to shape the way people live, work, and connect. More than 138 years in the making, we’re one of the world’s largest development and construction companies, with 2024 revenue totaling SEK 177 billion. We operate in select markets...

NAICS:23

NAICS Definition:Construction

Employees:23,492

Subsidiaries:0

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Tate

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Skanska

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tate in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Skanska in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Skanska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Skanska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Tate

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

Skanska

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tate company and Skanska company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Tate company and Skanska company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Tate company and Skanska company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Tate company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Tate company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Tate company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Tate company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Tate company and Skanska company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Tate company and Skanska company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Tate company and Skanska company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Tate company and Skanska company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Tate and Skanska, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Tate and Skanska, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tate or Skanska ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tate or Skanska ?

Between Tate and Skanska, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Tate and Skanska, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-76929

SUMMARY

Pcapng file parser crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76928

SUMMARY

X.509IF protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76927

SUMMARY

H.245 protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76926

SUMMARY

BUSMASTER file parser abnormal exit in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 3.1

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

1.4

EXPLOITABILITY

1.6

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76924

SUMMARY

Kerberos protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.8

REFERENCES