Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata SteelIndustrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel
VS
MaadenMaaden
Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel

Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel

43 JN Road, Kolkata, 700071, IN

Last Update: 26/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://ibmd.tatasteel.com/
688/1000Weak

The Industrial By-products Management Division (IBMD) of Tata Steel has adopted circular economy principles as an integral part of its business values. Our goal, at IBMD, is the 100% efficient use of by-products and sending zero waste to landfill. We make optimal use of...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Maaden

Maaden

Saudi Arabia, Riyadh, SA, 11537

Last Update: 10/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.maaden.com
819/1000Good

Maaden is Saudi Arabia’s engine of industrial transformation and one of the world’s top ten mining giants by market cap and fastest growing globally. We’re building the future of mining, creating fully integrated value chains across gold, phosphate, bauxite, copper and ...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:11,163
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel

Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Maaden

Maaden

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maaden in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Maaden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maaden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel

Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DELOPETATAPPCELCOU1782491615
Maaden

Maaden

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel company and Maaden company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel company and Maaden company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel company and Maaden company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel company and Maaden company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel company and Maaden company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel company and Maaden company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel company and Maaden company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel company and Maaden company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel company and Maaden company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel company and Maaden company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel company and Maaden company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel and Maaden, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel and Maaden, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel or Maaden ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel or Maaden ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel and Maaden, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Industrial By-Products Management Division, Tata Steel and Maaden, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8