Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tata Elxsi JapanTata Elxsi Japan
VS
Hexaware TechnologiesHexaware Technologies
Tata Elxsi Japan

Tata Elxsi Japan

堀川町580, 川崎市, 212-0013, JP

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://tataelxsi.com/
752/1000Fair

タタ・エレクシー・リミテッドは、自動車、放送、通信、ヘルスケアなどの業界に向けて設計および技術サービスを提供する会社です。当社は、IoT (モノのインターネット)、クラウド、モビリティ、仮想現実、人工知能などのデジタル技術のデザイン思考とその応用によりお客様の製品とサービスを新たに具現化しています。まさに 無限の可能性を秘めた場所であると言っても過言ではありません。私たちは、誰にでもチャンスがあると信じています。大胆に、好奇心旺盛に、未来を形作ることを目指しています。可能性を探り、好きなことを発見し、成長への加速する道をどうぞ見つけて...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hexaware Technologies

Hexaware Technologies

#1, Sector III, Millennium Business Park,, 'A'​ Block , TTC Industrial Estate, Mahape,, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400710

Last Update: 17/08/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hexaware.com
765/1000Fair

At Hexaware, we're not just a global technology and business process services company; we're a community of 31,600+ Hexawarians dedicated to one singular purpose: creating smiles through the power of great people and technology. With a presence in 58 offices across 28 c...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:36,701
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tata Elxsi Japan

Tata Elxsi Japan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hexaware Technologies

Hexaware Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Elxsi Japan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Hexaware Technologies has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Tata Elxsi Japan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Elxsi Japan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hexaware Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hexaware Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tata Elxsi Japan

Tata Elxsi Japan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hexaware Technologies

Hexaware Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HCLTAT1786448292

FAQ

Between Tata Elxsi Japan company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan and Hexaware Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan and Hexaware Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tata Elxsi Japan or Hexaware Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tata Elxsi Japan or Hexaware Technologies ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan and Hexaware Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tata Elxsi Japan and Hexaware Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA