Comparison Overview

Tata Electronics

VS

Steel Authority of India Limited

Tata Electronics

Sarjapur Road, Bengaluru, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tataelectronics.com/

Tata Electronics is a prominent global player in the electronics manufacturing industry, with fast-emerging capabilities in Electronics Manufacturing Services, Semiconductor Assembly and Test, Semiconductor Foundry, and Design Services. Established in 2020 as a greenfield venture of the Tata Group, the company aims to serve global customers through integrated offerings across a trusted electronics and semiconductor value chain.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 15,524
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Steel Authority of India Limited

IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sail.co.in

Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) traces its origin to the formative years of an emerging nation - India. After independence, the steel sector was to propel the economic growth and rapid industrialization of the country, and since 1973, SAIL steel has played a pivotal role in transforming the nation. SAIL is the largest steel-making company in India and one of the seven Maharatna’s of the country’s Central Public Sector Enterprises. We produce top quality steel and iron at five integrated plants and three special steel plants, located principally in the eastern and central regions of India and situated close to domestic sources of raw materials. We manufacture and sell a broad range of steel products which are high in demand in the domestic as well as international market. Visit this page regularly to stay connected and get updates about our products, new initiatives, accomplishments, and more.. Follow us at X: www.x.com/SAILSteel and www.instgram.com/steelauthority

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 13,694
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelectronicspvtltd.jpeg
Tata Electronics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steel-authority-of-india-limited.jpeg
Steel Authority of India Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tata Electronics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Steel Authority of India Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Electronics in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Steel Authority of India Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Tata Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Steel Authority of India Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Steel Authority of India Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelectronicspvtltd.jpeg
Tata Electronics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steel-authority-of-india-limited.jpeg
Steel Authority of India Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tata Electronics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Steel Authority of India Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Steel Authority of India Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tata Electronics company.

In the current year, Steel Authority of India Limited company and Tata Electronics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Steel Authority of India Limited company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Steel Authority of India Limited company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Steel Authority of India Limited company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tata Electronics company nor Steel Authority of India Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tata Electronics company nor Steel Authority of India Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tata Electronics company employs more people globally than Steel Authority of India Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References