Comparison Overview

Tata Electronics

VS

Kimberly-Clark

Tata Electronics

Sarjapur Road, Bengaluru, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tataelectronics.com/

Tata Electronics is a prominent global player in the electronics manufacturing industry, with fast-emerging capabilities in Electronics Manufacturing Services, Semiconductor Assembly and Test, Semiconductor Foundry, and Design Services. Established in 2020 as a greenfield venture of the Tata Group, the company aims to serve global customers through integrated offerings across a trusted electronics and semiconductor value chain.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 15,524
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Kimberly-Clark

351 Phelps Dr, None, Irving, TX, US, 75038
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849
https://linktr.ee/KimberlyClarkCareers

As a Kimberly-Clark employee, you have an opportunity to impact billions of lives through the products we make, the workplaces we create and the communities we serve. The proof is in our purpose – Here, we are creating Better Care for a Better World and it starts with YOU! Learn more about us and see what inspires you, careersatkc.com. Through collaborative teams that push boundaries and endless opportunities to work with some of the world’s most recognized brands, at Kimberly-Clark you and your purpose are in the driver seat of your career. Huggies®. Kleenex®. Andrex®. Scott®. Kotex®. Poise®. Depend®. The proof is in our products – For 150 years, our brands have been brought to market by a team of purpose-led innovators dedicated to creating Better Care for a Better World. And it takes the right people—in the right jobs and the right place—to make that happen. Join our 45,000+ employees who are changing the world for the better and generously giving back to communities and causes around the globe. Better Care for a Better World starts by taking care of you and giving you what you need to succeed. We’re dedicated to breaking down barriers to speed decision making and creating a workplace with relentless focus on our consumers and growing our people, like you. The proof is in our people – we've been rated as one of Forbes 2022 World's Best Employers, and it's because of the caring people and the amazing culture that brings out the best in everyone. Join our employees in our amazing culture that brings out the best in everyone. To make Kimberly-Clark's social media channels an engaging, respectful environment, here are our Community Guidelines: https://www.kimberly-clark.com/en-us/company/community-guidelines

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 34,282
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelectronicspvtltd.jpeg
Tata Electronics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kimberly-clark.jpeg
Kimberly-Clark
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tata Electronics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kimberly-Clark
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Electronics in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kimberly-Clark in 2025.

Incident History — Tata Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kimberly-Clark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kimberly-Clark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelectronicspvtltd.jpeg
Tata Electronics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kimberly-clark.jpeg
Kimberly-Clark
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials
Motivation: Unknown
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Kimberly-Clark company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tata Electronics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Kimberly-Clark company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Tata Electronics company has not reported any.

In the current year, Kimberly-Clark company and Tata Electronics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kimberly-Clark company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Kimberly-Clark company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Tata Electronics company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Kimberly-Clark company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tata Electronics company nor Kimberly-Clark company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Kimberly-Clark holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tata Electronics company nor Kimberly-Clark company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kimberly-Clark company employs more people globally than Tata Electronics company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Kimberly-Clark holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Kimberly-Clark holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Kimberly-Clark holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Kimberly-Clark holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Kimberly-Clark holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Kimberly-Clark holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References