Comparison Overview
Tata Technologies

Tata Technologies
25 Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjawadi, Pune, 411057, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We're a global product engineering and digital services company focused on fulfilling our mission of helping the world drive, fly, build, and farm by enabling our customers to realize better products and deliver better experiences. We’re the strategic engineering partne...

L&T Technology Services
L&T Knowledge City, West Block, Vadodara, Gujarat, 390019, IN
Last Update: 26/03/2026
L&T Technology Services (LTTS) is one of the world’s leading engineering and technology service providers. With operations in over 25 countries and a growing annual revenue that now surpasses USD 1.2 billion, we work with organizations who design, develop or deliver p...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Tata Technologies







L&T Technology Services






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tata Technologies in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for L&T Technology Services in 2026.
Incident History - Tata Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - L&T Technology Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
L&T Technology Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Tata Technologies

L&T Technology Services
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.