Comparison Overview

Tata Motors

VS

PACCAR

Tata Motors

Bypass Road, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411046
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.tatamotors.com

At the forefront of shaping mobility for over eight decades, driven by a legacy of innovation and an unwavering commitment to excellence. We fuse next-generation technologies with operational precision and continuous value creation — across every vehicle and process. But what truly sets us apart is our purpose: transforming lives, empowering communities, and building next-gen mobility solutions. Smart tech. Safer mobility. Greener journeys — creating a cleaner, more connected world and shaping a better future.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 72,259
Subsidiaries: 54
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3
View Profile

PACCAR

777 106th Ave NE, Bellevue, WA, 98004, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
http://www.paccar.com

PACCAR is a global technology leader in the design, manufacture and customer support of premium light-, medium- and heavy-duty trucks under the Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF nameplates. PACCAR also designs and manufactures advanced diesel engines, provides financial services, information technology, and distributes truck parts related to its principal business. Kenworth Truck Company builds premium commercial vehicles for sale in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and Australia and for export throughout the world. Peterbilt Motors also designs, manufactures and distributes premium commercial vehicles in the US and Canada. DAF Trucks manufactures trucks in the Netherlands, Belgium, Brasil and the United Kingdom for sale throughout Western and Eastern Europe, and export to Asia, Africa, North and South America. PACCAR Parts operates a network of parts distribution centers offering aftermarket support to Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF dealers and customers around the world. Aftermarket support includes customer call centers operating 24 hours a day throughout the year and technologically advanced systems to enhance inventory control and expedite order processing. PACCAR Financial Services provides finance, lease and insurance services to dealers and customers in more than 100 countries including a portfolio of more than 175,000 trucks and trailers and total assets in excess of $12 billion. The group includes PACCAR Leasing, a major full-service truck leasing company in North America, with a fleet of over 39,000 vehicles. Environmental responsibility is one of PACCAR’s core values. The company regularly develops new programs to help protect and preserve the environment and PACCAR has established ambitious goals to further reduce emissions and enhance fuel efficiency in its truck models.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 18,469
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-motors.jpeg
Tata Motors
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paccar.jpeg
PACCAR
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tata Motors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PACCAR
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Tata Motors has 233.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PACCAR in 2025.

Incident History — Tata Motors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Motors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PACCAR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PACCAR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-motors.jpeg
Tata Motors
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing Emails, Spoofed Supplier Communications, WhatsApp Scams, Human Error (Misplaced Trust)
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Reputational Damage, Exploitation of Human Behavior
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paccar.jpeg
PACCAR
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PACCAR company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tata Motors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tata Motors company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas PACCAR company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tata Motors company has reported more cyber incidents than PACCAR company.

Tata Motors company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while PACCAR company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Motors company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other PACCAR company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Motors company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while PACCAR company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Tata Motors company nor PACCAR company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tata Motors nor PACCAR holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tata Motors company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PACCAR company.

Tata Motors company employs more people globally than PACCAR company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Tata Motors nor PACCAR holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor PACCAR holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor PACCAR holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor PACCAR holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor PACCAR holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor PACCAR holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References