Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tata Housing Development Company LimitedTata Housing Development Company Limited
VS
SM SupermallsSM Supermalls
Tata Housing Development Company Limited

Tata Housing Development Company Limited

Chinchpokli Road, Mumbai, 400033, IN

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tatahousing.com/
766/1000Fair

Established in 1984, Tata Housing is a closely held public limited company and a subsidiary of TATA Sons Limited. TATA Sons Limited holds 99.86% of equity share capital of the company. Since its revival in 2006, the company has grown exponentially establishing itself...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:865
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SM Supermalls

SM Supermalls

Mall of Asia Complex, Pasay City, 1300, PH

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
784/1000Fair

The SM Group of companies stands today as an institution, a store, a mall, a bank, a home, a resort, a hotel, and a place to see and experience with the family. One of the core business areas of the SM Group is the Shopping Center Management Corporation, generally ref...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:13,749
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tata Housing Development Company Limited

Tata Housing Development Company Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SM Supermalls

SM Supermalls

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Housing Development Company Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SM Supermalls in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tata Housing Development Company Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Housing Development Company Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SM Supermalls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SM Supermalls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tata Housing Development Company Limited

Tata Housing Development Company Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SM Supermalls

SM Supermalls

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited company and SM Supermalls company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited company and SM Supermalls company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited company and SM Supermalls company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited company and SM Supermalls company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited company and SM Supermalls company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited and SM Supermalls, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited and SM Supermalls, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tata Housing Development Company Limited or SM Supermalls ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tata Housing Development Company Limited or SM Supermalls ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited and SM Supermalls, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tata Housing Development Company Limited and SM Supermalls, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8