Comparison Overview
Tata Elxsi Media & Communications
Tata Elxsi Media & Communications
ITPB Road, Bangalore, 560048, IN
Last Update: 14/03/2026
Tata Elxsi addresses the entire product development lifecycle for Media, Broadcast, Communications, and Consumer Electronics, from R&D to new product development, testing, and maintenance engineering. We work with leading MSOs, content providers, and studios to develop ...
Ricoh USA, Inc.
300 Eagleview Blvd, Exton, 19341, US
Last Update: 29/03/2026
At Ricoh, we bring people, processes, and technology together to make information work for you. We unlock the power of information so organizations can unlock the full potential of their people. We're a leader in information management and digital services, creating com...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Tata Elxsi Media & Communications
Ricoh USA, Inc.
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tata Elxsi Media & Communications in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ricoh USA, Inc. in 2026.
Incident History - Tata Elxsi Media & Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Elxsi Media & Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ricoh USA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ricoh USA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Tata Elxsi Media & Communications
Ricoh USA, Inc.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.