Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tata Consultancy Services - UK and IrelandTata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland
VS
VerizonVerizon
Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland

Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland

Floor 44 22 Bishopsgate Road, London, EC2N 4BQ, GB

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tcs.com
749/1000Moderate

Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) (BSE: 532540, NSE: TCS) is a digital transformation and technology partner of choice for industry-leading organisations worldwide. Since its inception in 1968, TCS has upheld the highest standards of innovation, engineering excellence and...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Verizon

Verizon

One Verizon Way, Basking Ridge, 07920-1097, US

Last Update: 25/07/2026

View Profile
377/1000Critical

We get you. You want more out of a career. A place to share your ideas freely — even if they’re daring or different. Where the true you can learn, grow, and thrive. You’ll find all that here. Because we empower you. We power and empower how people live, work and play ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:101,992
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
18
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland

Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Verizon

Verizon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Verizon has 476.92% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Verizon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Verizon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland

Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Verizon

Verizon

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
VERONE1784967835
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
VER1779352298
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
VERGOOECL1773851169

FAQ

Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Verizon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Verizon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Verizon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Verizon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Verizon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Verizon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Verizon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Verizon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Verizon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Verizon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Verizon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland and Verizon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland and Verizon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland or Verizon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland or Verizon ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland and Verizon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland and Verizon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1