Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tata Consultancy Services - UK and IrelandTata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland
VS
Sopra SteriaSopra Steria
Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland

Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland

Floor 44 22 Bishopsgate Road, London, EC2N 4BQ, GB

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tcs.com
749/1000Moderate

Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) (BSE: 532540, NSE: TCS) is a digital transformation and technology partner of choice for industry-leading organisations worldwide. Since its inception in 1968, TCS has upheld the highest standards of innovation, engineering excellence and...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sopra Steria

Sopra Steria

9 rue de Presbourg, Paris, 75016, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.soprasteria.com
643/1000Poor

Sopra Steria, a major Tech player in Europe with 51,000 employees in nearly 30 countries, is recognised for its consulting, digital services and solutions. It helps its clients drive their digital transformation and obtain tangible and sustainable benefits. The Group pr...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:46,767
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland

Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sopra Steria

Sopra Steria

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sopra Steria in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sopra Steria (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sopra Steria cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland

Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sopra Steria

Sopra Steria

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SOP526062025
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SOP215691122

FAQ

Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Sopra Steria company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Sopra Steria company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Sopra Steria company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Sopra Steria company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Sopra Steria company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Sopra Steria company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Sopra Steria company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Sopra Steria company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Sopra Steria company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Sopra Steria company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland company and Sopra Steria company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland and Sopra Steria, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland and Sopra Steria, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland or Sopra Steria ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland or Sopra Steria ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland and Sopra Steria, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tata Consultancy Services - UK and Ireland and Sopra Steria, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA