Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TAROCASHTAROCASH
VS
AcostaAcosta
TAROCASH

TAROCASH

AU

Last Update: 21/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://tarocash.com.au/
771/1000Fair

Tarocash was founded in 1987 by brothers Stephen and Michael Leibowitz, who brought with them a family heritage of menswear retailing from South Africa. They began supplying menswear to retail outlets across Australia and quickly realised that Australian men were in des...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:369
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Acosta

Acosta

6651 Gate Pkwy, Jacksonville, Florida, US, 32256

Last Update: 18/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.acosta.com
792/1000Fair

Acosta brings simplicity to retail sales. We act as a catalyst to boldly connect brands, retailers and consumers, fueling growth and building long-term value throughout North America and Europe. We are deeply embedded in every corner of the retail industry, strengtheni...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,353
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TAROCASH

TAROCASH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Acosta

Acosta

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TAROCASH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acosta in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TAROCASH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TAROCASH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Acosta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acosta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TAROCASH

TAROCASH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Acosta

Acosta

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TAROCASH company and Acosta company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TAROCASH company and Acosta company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TAROCASH company and Acosta company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TAROCASH company and Acosta company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TAROCASH company and Acosta company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TAROCASH company and Acosta company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TAROCASH company and Acosta company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TAROCASH company and Acosta company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TAROCASH company and Acosta company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TAROCASH company and Acosta company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TAROCASH company and Acosta company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TAROCASH and Acosta, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TAROCASH and Acosta, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TAROCASH or Acosta ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TAROCASH or Acosta ?
Between TAROCASH and Acosta, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TAROCASH and Acosta, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-100739
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in mathurvishal CloudClassroom-PHP-Project up to 5dadec098bfbbf3300d60c3494db3fb95b66e7be. This impacts an unknown function of the file viewresult.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument seno results in sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-94408
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Elasticsearch can lead denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-94400
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-94399
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Elasticsearch can lead denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-94398
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Elasticsearch can lead denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES