Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TARGO VersicherungenTARGO Versicherungen
VS
Blue Cross Blue Shield of MichiganBlue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
TARGO Versicherungen

TARGO Versicherungen

Proactiv-Platz 1, None, Hilden, Nordrhein-Westfalen, DE, 40721

Last Update: 15/12/2025

View Profile
750/1000Fair

Spezialisten – Hand in Hand. Vielseitig. Innovativ. Emotional. Versicherungsvertrieb, wie wir ihn leben. Bancassurance – der Vertrieb von Versicherungsprodukten über den Bankschalter – zählt heute zu den erfolgreichsten Konzepten im internationalen Markt. Die TARGO Ve...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:29
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

600 E Lafayette Blvd, Detroit, 48226, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bcbsm.com
771/1000Fair

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan is a nonprofit corporation and an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. BCBSM's commitment to Michigan is what differentiates it from other health insurance companies doing business in the state. That ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:10,365
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TARGO Versicherungen

TARGO Versicherungen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TARGO Versicherungen in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TARGO Versicherungen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TARGO Versicherungen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TARGO Versicherungen

TARGO Versicherungen

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TARGO Versicherungen company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TARGO Versicherungen or Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TARGO Versicherungen or Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TARGO Versicherungen and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-26422
SUMMARY

clash-verge-service-ipc before 2.3.0 has a world-reachable IPC endpoint, leading to local privilege escalation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-11441
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This vulnerability affects the function canAccessIssue of the file /issues/ of the component Pull Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument issue leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to resolve this issue. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11440
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This affects an unknown part of the file /repositories/{projectId}/default-branch of the component REST API. This manipulation of the argument project.defaultBranch causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to mitigate this issue. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11439
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /projects/ of the component Parent Project Handler. The manipulation of the argument project.parentId results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 can resolve this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11438
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /projects. The manipulation of the argument project.forkedFromId leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 addresses this issue. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8