Comparison Overview

GeoVision

VS

Petrobras

GeoVision

5811 Irvington Blvd, Houston, TX 77009, Houston, Texas, US, 77008
Last Update: 2025-12-01

When a well kicks off horizontally, our expertise runs deep. At GeoVision, our experienced geologists have overseen every basin in North America. With so much on the line, you need a partner that goes all-in- a team of geologists who put their heart into it. At GeoVision, we steer the way and our clients come out looking like rock stars.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Petrobras

Avenida República do Chile, n. 65, Centro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BR, 20031-912
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Nosso propósito é prover energia que assegure prosperidade de forma ética, justa, segura e competitiva. Queremos ser a melhor empresa diversificada e integrada de energia na geração de valor, construindo um mundo mais sustentável, conciliando o foco em óleo e gás com a diversificação em negócios de baixo carbono (inclusive produtos petroquímicos e fertilizantes), sustentabilidade, segurança, respeito ao meio ambiente e atenção total às pessoas. Saiba mais em petrobras.com.br

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 53,942
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/targeted-geovision-llc.jpeg
GeoVision
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/petrobras.jpeg
Petrobras
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GeoVision
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Petrobras
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GeoVision in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

Petrobras has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — GeoVision (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GeoVision cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Petrobras (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Petrobras cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/targeted-geovision-llc.jpeg
GeoVision
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Command Injection
Motivation: DDoS, Cryptomining
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/petrobras.jpeg
Petrobras
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, data exfiltration for competitive advantage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Petrobras company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GeoVision company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

GeoVision and Petrobras have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Petrobras company has reported more cyber incidents than GeoVision company.

Petrobras company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while GeoVision company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Petrobras company nor GeoVision company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Petrobras company nor GeoVision company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

GeoVision company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Petrobras company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither GeoVision nor Petrobras holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GeoVision company nor Petrobras company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Petrobras company employs more people globally than GeoVision company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither GeoVision nor Petrobras holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GeoVision nor Petrobras holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GeoVision nor Petrobras holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GeoVision nor Petrobras holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GeoVision nor Petrobras holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GeoVision nor Petrobras holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A weakness has been identified in codingWithElias School Management System up to f1ac334bfd89ae9067cc14dea12ec6ff3f078c01. Affected is an unknown function of the file /student-view.php of the component Edit Student Info Page. This manipulation of the argument First Name causes cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. Other parameters might be affected as well. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

By providing a command-line argument starting with a semi-colon ; to an API endpoint created by the EnhancedCommandExecutor class of the HexStrike AI MCP server, the resultant composed command is executed directly in the context of the MCP server’s normal privilege; typically, this is root. There is no attempt to sanitize these arguments in the default configuration of this MCP server at the affected version (as of commit 2f3a5512 in September of 2025).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

A weakness has been identified in winston-dsouza Ecommerce-Website up to 87734c043269baac0b4cfe9664784462138b1b2e. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /includes/header_menu.php of the component GET Parameter Handler. Executing manipulation of the argument Error can lead to cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product implements a rolling release for ongoing delivery, which means version information for affected or updated releases is unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Qualitor 8.20/8.24. Affected by this vulnerability is the function eval of the file /html/st/stdeslocamento/request/getResumo.php. Performing manipulation of the argument passageiros results in code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Scada-LTS up to 2.7.8.1. Affected is the function Common.getHomeDir of the file br/org/scadabr/vo/exporter/ZIPProjectManager.java of the component Project Import. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X