Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Target Engineering Construction Co LLCTarget Engineering Construction Co LLC
VS
Turner Construction CompanyTurner Construction Company
Target Engineering Construction Co LLC

Target Engineering Construction Co LLC

Al Mu-Atamarat Street, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, 960, AE

Last Update: 12/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.target.ae
767/1000Fair

Target Engineering Construction Company was established in 1975 and operates through its specialized divisions – Power, Oil and Gas Division and Civil & Marine Division. Target Engineering Construction Company offers a single source EPC service with standalone specialt...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:3,922
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Turner Construction Company

Turner Construction Company

66 Hudson Blvd E, New York, 10001, US

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
702/1000Moderate

Turner is a North America-based, international construction services company and is a leading builder in diverse and numerous market segments. The company has earned recognition for undertaking large, complex projects, fostering innovation, embracing emerging technologi...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:20,423
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Target Engineering Construction Co LLC

Target Engineering Construction Co LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Turner Construction Company

Turner Construction Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Target Engineering Construction Co LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

Turner Construction Company has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Target Engineering Construction Co LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Target Engineering Construction Co LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Turner Construction Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turner Construction Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Target Engineering Construction Co LLC

Target Engineering Construction Co LLC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Turner Construction Company

Turner Construction Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TUR1787430343
🔒 Incident : Breach
TUR147072625

FAQ

Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC company and Turner Construction Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC company and Turner Construction Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC and Turner Construction Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC and Turner Construction Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Target Engineering Construction Co LLC or Turner Construction Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Target Engineering Construction Co LLC or Turner Construction Company ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC and Turner Construction Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Target Engineering Construction Co LLC and Turner Construction Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9