Target
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
target
Website:
Employees number:
165,627
Number of followers:
2,334,140
NAICS:
43
Industry Type:
Homepage:
www.target.com/careers
IP Addresses:
440
Company ID:
TAR_8863761
Scan Status:
Completed
Target Company CyberSecurity Posture
www.target.com/careers
Target is one of the world’s most recognized brands and one of America’s leading retailers. We make Target our guests’ preferred shopping destination by offering outstanding value, inspiration, innovation and an exceptional guest experience that no other retailer can deliver. Target is committed to responsible corporate citizenship, ethical business practices, environmental stewardship and generous community support. Since 1946, we have given 5 percent of our profits back to our communities. Our goal is to work as one team to fulfill our unique brand promise to our guests, wherever and whenever they choose to shop. For more information, visit corporate.target.com. Beware of Hiring Scams: Target will never ask you to submit personal information via a text message for a position. Target will only ask you to apply for positions through corporate.target.com/careers, or Workday, our applicant tracking system.
Target A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Target Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 650 and 699
Target
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Target Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Target
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Target Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
32
Attack Types
4
Target Corporation
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Target Corporation on December 20, 2013. The breach occurred between November 27 and December 15, 2013, resulting from unauthorized access to payment card data. Compromised information included customer names, credit or debit card numbers, expiration dates, and CVVs. The number of individuals affected is unknown.
Target
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target experienced a devastating cyber attack that compromised the payment card details of 41 million customers along with the contact information of about 70 million individuals. This cyber incident is one of the most significant attacks in retail, highlighting the severe vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendors and the systemic risks within retail network infrastructures. The hackers initiated the breach through a spear phishing attack aimed at a third-party vendor, gaining unauthorized access to Target's network. Subsequently, they deployed malware to collect sensitive customer data over two months. The financial repercussions of this cyber attack were monumental, with Target incurring approximately $290 million in costs related to legal settlements, remediation efforts, consulting, and other associated expenses. The breach not only led to substantial financial losses but also severely damaged Target's reputation and trust with customers, marking a pivotal moment that emphasizes the importance of cybersecurity vigilance in the retail sector.
Target
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target faced a catastrophic cyber attack, marking one of the most substantial retail security breaches in history. The breach exposed sensitive information of approximately 41 million payment cards and personal details of roughly 70 million customers. This cyber onslaught began with a spear-phishing attack targeting a third-party vendor, which led to the compromise of Target's network. Once inside, the attackers deployed malware to harvest vast amounts of customer data over two months. The financial ramifications were staggering, with the breach's total cost nearing $290 million, including fines, settlements, remediation efforts, consulting fees, and more. Beyond the monetary impact, the breach severely tarnished Target's brand and led to the departure of its CEO. The incident underscores the critical importance of robust cybersecurity measures, especially concerning third-party vendor management and network security.
Target
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target faced a massive cyber attack that exposed 41 million payment cards and compromised contact information for approximately 70 million customers. This incident occurred when threat actors launched a spear phishing attack on a third-party vendor to steal user credentials. Having gained access to Target's network, the attackers then installed malware to capture customer payment information over a two-month period. The ramifications of this breach were severe; Target's CEO departed the organization, and the company had to settle fines totaling $18.5 million to resolve claims across the country. The total cost to Target, including expenses for remediation, consulting fees, and other payments, approached approximately $290 million. This cyber attack highlights the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures and the importance of vigilantly managing third-party risks.
Target
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target faced a monumental cybersecurity crisis when it became the victim of a cyber attack that exposed the payment card information of 41 million customers and personal contact information for approximately 70 million people. This breach was orchestrated through a spear-phishing attack on a third-party vendor, which allowed the attackers to access Target's network. Subsequently, malware was installed to collect customer data over two months. The repercussions were severe, resulting in the departure of Target's CEO and the company incurring costs upwards of $290 million. This included fines totalling $18.5 million to settle nationwide claims, remediation efforts, consulting fees, and other related expenses. This cyber attack underscores the critical importance of vigilant cybersecurity measures, especially in safeguarding third-party vendor connections and the need for robust systems to detect and prevent malware deployment.
Target
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a massive cyber attack that became one of the most notorious in retail history. This breach exposed the payment card details of 41 million customers and contact information for an additional 29 million. The attackers gained access through a third-party vendor, leveraging a spear-phishing attack to steal credentials. Once inside Target’s network, they deployed malware that captured customer data over two months. The fallout from this breach was significant, leading to the departure of Target’s CEO and costing the company approximately $290 million in remediation, consulting fees, legal settlements, and other related expenses. The incident highlighted the vulnerabilities in the supply chain and the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures.
Target
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target suffered one of the most significant cyber attacks in retail history, exposing 41 million payment cards and contact information for approximately 70 million customers. The attack began with a spear phishing campaign targeting a third-party vendor to steal credentials. Once inside Target’s network, the attackers installed malware to harvest customer data over two months. This breach not only led to the departure of Target's CEO but also inflicted severe financial and reputational damage. The total cost to the company, including fines, remediation, consulting fees, and other expenses, amounted to approximately $290 million. To address the litigation and claims from various parties, Target paid fines totaling $18.5 million. The Target breach stands as a stark reminder of the critical importance of cybersecurity vigilance and the potential consequences of oversight or failure within the supply chain.
Target
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, a sophisticated cyber attack on Target resulted in the exposure of 41 million payment cards and the contact information of approximately 70 million customers. This cyber assault was initiated through a spear phishing operation targeting a third-party vendor, aimed at acquiring user credentials. Once the attackers had breached Target's defenses, they deployed malware designed to capture customer data during transactions over a two-month period. The aftermath of this breach was profound, leading to the departure of the CEO and culminating in Target agreeing to pay fines totalling $18.5 million to settle claims from across the country. Ultimately, the breach led to the company incurring around $290 million in costs, encompassing fines, remediation efforts, consulting fees, and more.
Target
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: The US retail behemoth Target has agreed to pay $18.5 million to resolve the 2013 data breach in a settlement with the US Attorneys General. Target consumers' credit and debit card accounts totalling close to 40 million were compromised in 2013 during the customary holiday shopping season. The corporation plans to reimburse its clients for the expenses they have incurred as well as for any harm they have suffered. The business will give the full sum of money to each Attorney General participating in the investigations; the Illinois Attorney General will receive $1.2 million, and the Connecticut Attorney General, who is spearheading the lawsuit against the corporation, will receive about $1 million.
Target
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The annual holiday shopping season may have seen the theft of around 40 million credit and debit card accounts belonging to Target consumers in the United States. The firm has sent a statement informing all customers who made purchases at Target shops over the Black Friday weekend of the news. All Target customers who made transactions by swiping their cards at terminals during the aforementioned time frame are in danger. Although Target has not revealed any additional details regarding the incident, it has comforted its customers by saying that the issue that caused the issue has been resolved and cardholders can resume using their credit cards to make purchases.
Target
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, **Target** suffered one of the most infamous third-party breaches in retail history when cybercriminals infiltrated its systems via a compromised **HVAC vendor (Fazio Mechanical Services)**. The attackers exploited weak credentials from the vendor’s network to access Target’s payment systems, stealing **40 million credit/debit card records** and **70 million customer details** (names, addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses). The breach resulted in **$200+ million in direct costs**, including legal settlements, regulatory fines, and credit monitoring for affected customers. Beyond financial losses, Target faced **severe reputational damage**, a **plummet in consumer trust**, and a **46% drop in profits** during the post-breach quarter. The incident also triggered industry-wide scrutiny of third-party risk management, prompting stricter compliance mandates like **PCI DSS updates** and accelerated adoption of vendor security audits. The breach exposed systemic vulnerabilities in supply chain cybersecurity, proving that even robust internal defenses could be bypassed through negligent third-party partners.
Target
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target fell victim to a significant cyber attack that compromised the payment card information of 41 million customers and the personal information of approximately 70 million customers. The attackers gained entry into Target's network by spear phishing a third-party vendor, ultimately installing malware to harvest customer data over two months. This breach, one of the largest in retail history, led to the CEO's departure and resulted in a combination of fines and remediation costs totaling approximately $290 million. Although Target settled country-wide claims for $18.5 million, the overall expense, including consulting and other related fees, pushed the cost close to $290 million. This event underscores the critical importance of cybersecurity vigilance, especially in protecting against sophisticated attack methods targeting third-party vendors.
Target
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack that could injure or kill people
Description: In 2013, Target became the victim of a significant cyber attack that compromised the payment cards of 41 million customers and the contact information of an additional 70 million customers. This breach, which resulted from a spear-phishing attack on a third-party vendor, enabled attackers to install malware that captured customer data over two months. The financial impact of the breach was monumental, costing Target approximately $290 million after including fines, remediation, consulting fees, and other related expenses. This incident led to the departure of Target's CEO and highlighted the catastrophic potential of cybersecurity threats. The settlement of country-wide claims alone amounted to $18.5 million, underscoring the extensive legal and financial ramifications of such breaches.
Target
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target experienced a severe cyber attack that exposed the payment card information of 41 million customers and the contact information for approximately 70 million customers. The breach was orchestrated via a spear phishing attack aimed at a third-party vendor, which allowed the attackers to compromise Target's network and install malware. This malware was then used to capture customer data over two months. The financial repercussions of the attack were substantial, with the overall cost to Target being approximately $290 million. This included fines, remediation efforts, consulting fees, and other various expenses. The breach not only resulted in significant financial losses but also led to the departure of Target's CEO and harmed the company's reputation among consumers.
Target
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a monumental cyber attack that exposed the payment card information of 41 million customers along with the contact information for approximately another 70 million. This attack was orchestrated through a spear phishing campaign targeted at a third-party vendor. By securing credentials from this vendor, the attackers gained access to Target's network. Over a two-month period, malware installed within the system collected vast amounts of customer data. The breach not only led to the departure of Target's CEO but also incurred substantial financial costs for the company. Target resolved claims across the country by paying fines totaling $18.5 million. Including the expenses for remediation efforts, consulting services, and other associated payments, the total cost of the breach approximated $290 million. This incident underscores the vital importance of cybersecurity vigilance and the necessity for robust protection measures to safeguard against sophisticated cyber threats.
Target
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target suffered one of the costliest cyber attacks in retail history, impacting 70 million customers. The breach exposed 41 million payment cards and leaked the contact information of approximately 70 million individuals. This sophisticated cyber attack began with a spear phishing attempt aimed at a third-party vendor, leading to compromised network access. By installing malware on Target’s system, cybercriminals captured vast amounts of customer data over two months. The incident had profound consequences for Target, including the departure of their CEO. Financially, the breach led to fines of $18.5 million and an approximate total cost of $290 million to the company, covering remediation, consulting fees, and settlements. This example underscores the high stakes of cybersecurity in the retail sector and the critical importance of safeguarding against third-party vulnerabilities and maintaining robust protection measures.
Target
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In one of the most notable retail cyber attacks, Target experienced a devastating breach in 2013 that exposed 41 million payment cards and the contact information of roughly 70 million customers. The attackers employed a spear phishing technique to compromise a third-party vendor's network credentials. Once inside Target's network, they installed malware to capture customer payment data for two months. The breach had far-reaching consequences, including the departure of Target's CEO and fines totaling $18.5 million to resolve nationwide claims. The total cost to Target, considering remediation, consulting fees, and other related expenses, approximately amounted to $290 million. This incident underscores the critical importance of cybersecurity in the retail sector and highlights the vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendors.
Target
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In one of the most significant retail cyber attacks, Target faced a devastating breach in 2013 that exposed 41 million payment cards and contact information for approximately 70 million customers. Utilizing a spear phishing attack aimed at a third-party vendor to gain network access, attackers deployed malware to capture customer data over two months. The aftermath of this breach saw the departure of Target’s CEO and the company incurring costs around $290 million. This included fines of $18.5 million to settle nationwide claims, alongside expenses for remediation, consulting, and other related payments. The breach not only highlighted the vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendors but also emphasized the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures in protecting sensitive customer information.
Target
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target experienced a devastating cyber attack that compromised 41 million payment cards and the contact information of approximately 70 million customers. This breach occurred when threat actors launched a spear phishing attack on a third-party vendor, successfully stealing user credentials. With these credentials, the attackers were able to access Target's network and implant malware to capture customer data over two months. The repercussions of this breach were far-reaching, ultimately costing the company approximately $290 million in remediation, consulting fees, and fines, including an $18.5 million settlement to resolve claims nationwide. The CEO of Target left in the aftermath, highlighting the immense impact such an attack can have on corporate leadership and the company's reputation. This incident underscores the pressing need for robust cybersecurity measures, particularly for retailers holding vast amounts of sensitive customer information.
Target
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target experienced a monumental cyber attack that compromised approximately 41 million payment cards and the contact details of roughly 70 million customers. This breach was executed through a spear phishing attack aimed at a third-party vendor, a method which allowed the attackers to steal user credentials and infiltrate Target's network. Once inside, they deployed malware to capture customer data over two months. The aftermath of this security breach was severe, with Target's CEO leaving the company and the organization facing fines totaling $18.5 million to settle nationwide claims. The total cost to Target, including remediation efforts, consulting fees, and various other related expenses, amounted to approximately $290 million.
Target
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a considerable cybersecurity breach that exposed 41 million payment cards and the contact information of approximately 70 million customers. Using a spear phishing attack on a third-party vendor to harvest user credentials, attackers accessed Target's network and installed malware to capture customer data over two months. This breach significantly impacted Target, leading to the CEO's departure and costs approximating $290 million when considering fines, remediation, consulting fees, and other related expenses. The breach underscored the vital importance of robust cybersecurity measures and the complexities involved in protecting customer data, especially for large retail organizations.
Target
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a significant cyber attack that exposed the payment information of 41 million customers and contact details for approximately 70 million individuals. The attackers initially gained entry into Target's network by launching a spear phishing attack on a third-party vendor to steal user credentials. With access secured, they strategically deployed malware to harvest customer data over a two-month period. The fallout from this breach was substantial for Target, both financially and reputationally. The breach's total costs approached $290 million, including a major settlement and various expenses related to breach remediation efforts. Additionally, the breach had significant leadership implications, contributing to the departure of Target's CEO. This event underscored the critical importance of robust cybersecurity measures, especially regarding third-party vendors and the protection of sensitive customer data.
Target
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a substantial cyber attack, affecting 41 million payment cards and compromising the personal information of approximately 70 million customers. This attack, orchestrated via a spear phishing campaign targeting a third-party vendor, allowed the attackers to infiltrate Target's network. Subsequently, they deployed malware to capture customer payment information over two months. The attack not only led to the CEO's departure but also resulted in significant financial repercussions for Target. The company incurred around $290 million in costs, encompassing fines, remediation efforts, consulting fees, and other related expenses, in an attempt to mitigate the damage and resolve nationwide claims brought against it.
Target
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In December 2013, Target fell victim to one of the largest retail cyber attacks in history. The attack exposed payment card information of 41 million customers and contact details for an additional 29 million. Utilizing a spear phishing technique, attackers initially compromised a third-party vendor's credentials, providing them with access to Target's network. Subsequently, malware was installed to collect customer payment data across a two-month period. This breach not only led to significant financial losses amounting to approximately $290 million but also resulted in the departure of Target's CEO and country-wide fines totaling $18.5 million. Remediation efforts, consulting, and various associated expenses substantially increased the cost of this breach.
Target
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In a significant breach in 2013, Target fell victim to cybercriminals who exposed payment information for 41 million customers and contact details for an additional 29 million. The attackers initiated their campaign by targeting a third-party vendor with a spear phishing attack, which was designed to steal the vendor’s credentials. With access to Target’s network, they deployed malware that allowed them to capture customer payment details over a two-month period. This attack not only led to the enormity of customer data being compromised but also had substantial financial repercussions for Target. With the total costs for the breach nearing $290 million due to legal, remediation, and consulting fees among others, this event underscores the critical need for rigorous cybersecurity measures, especially in guarding against third-party vulnerabilities. The breach prompted significant changes at Target, including the departure of its CEO and the payment of fines totaling $18.5 million to settle claims country-wide, highlighting the severe impact attacks can have on an organization's financial health and leadership.
Target
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a massive cybersecurity breach that exposed the payment card information of 41 million customers and contact information for an additional 29 million individuals. Initiated via a spear phishing attack on a third-party vendor to steal credentials, the attackers then accessed Target's network and installed malware to collect the customer data over two months. This breach significantly impacted Target, leading to the departure of the company's CEO and resulting in $290 million in total costs, including fines, remediation, consulting fees, and other related expenses. The incident highlights the importance of robust cybersecurity practices, especially regarding third-party vendor management and the protection of customer data.
Target
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, a major cyberattack on Target compromised the payment card data and contact information of millions of customers. The attackers gained access to Target's network through a spear phishing attack targeted at a third-party vendor. Utilizing the obtained credentials, they deployed malware to capture customer information over two months. This breach exposed 41 million payment cards and affected approximately 70 million individuals. The financial and reputational damage to Target was significant, with the costs for resolving the issue, including legal fines, settlements, and other expenses, amounting to roughly $290 million. Additionally, the breach led to the departure of Target's CEO and highlighted the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures in protecting customer data.
Target
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target fell victim to a cyber attack that compromised the payment cards and contact information of millions. Specifically, the breach exposed 41 million payment cards and the personal information of about 70 million customers. The initial point of attack was a third-party vendor, targeted through a spear phishing attempt to steal credentials. Upon gaining access to Target's network, the attackers deployed malware to capture customer data over two months. This incident led to significant financial and reputational damage for Target. The company faced extensive litigation and regulatory scrutiny across the country, culminating in fines and various costs. The CEO of Target subsequently left the company. To resolve claims nationwide, Target paid $18.5 million in fines, contributing to the total cost of approximately $290 million for the breach, including remediation, consulting fees, and other expenses.
Target
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a massive data breach that impacted 41 million payment cards and exposed the contact information of approximately 70 million customers. This cyber attack was executed through a spear phishing campaign targeted at a third-party vendor, which allowed the attackers to gain access to Target's network. By installing malware, they were able to capture customer data over two months. The breach not only led to the CEO's departure but also incurred around $290 million in costs to the company, including fines, settlements, and other remediation expenses. This attack underscores the critical importance of cybersecurity in protecting sensitive customer information and maintaining trust.
Target
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a monumental cyber attack that compromised 41 million payment cards and contact information for roughly 70 million customers. This incident made headlines for its scale and the method of attack. Threat actors executed a spear phishing operation against a third-party vendor to gain credentials and access Target's network. Subsequently, malware was installed to harvest customer payment data over two months. The aftermath of this breach was severe, with Target's CEO leaving the company and the organization incurring approximately $290 million in costs related to fines, remediation efforts, consulting fees, and other associated expenses. The breach not only highlighted the vulnerabilities in supply chain security but also underscored the significant financial and reputational risks associated with cyber attacks on large retail operators.
Target
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In one of the most significant retail cyberattacks, Target experienced a massive breach in 2013, exposing 41 million payment cards and contact details for about 70 million customers. The attackers initially targeted a third-party vendor using a spear phishing technique to obtain credentials. They then infiltrated Target's network, deploying malware to capture customer data over two months. This incident had profound repercussions, leading to the CEO's departure and resulting in fines and expenses around $290 million for the company. It underscored the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures to protect sensitive customer information and maintain consumer trust.
Target
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, Target faced a catastrophic cyber attack that compromised the personal and payment information of millions of customers. The breach exposed information related to 41 million payment cards and contact details for about 70 million individuals. This massive security lapse was initiated via a spear phishing attack aimed at a third-party vendor, which then allowed the attackers to infiltrate Target's network. Over two months, malware installed on the network captured vast amounts of customer data, wreaking havoc on the company's reputation and financial standing. The fallout from this event was profound, leading to the departure of the CEO and costing the company approximately $290 million in fines, remediation efforts, consultancy fees, and other related expenses. The Target cyber attack serves as a stark reminder of the critical importance of cybersecurity vigilance and the far-reaching consequences of security failures.
Target Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Target
Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Target in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Target in 2025.
Incident Types Target vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Target in 2025.
Incident History — Target (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Target cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Target Company Subsidiaries
Target is one of the world’s most recognized brands and one of America’s leading retailers. We make Target our guests’ preferred shopping destination by offering outstanding value, inspiration, innovation and an exceptional guest experience that no other retailer can deliver. Target is committed to responsible corporate citizenship, ethical business practices, environmental stewardship and generous community support. Since 1946, we have given 5 percent of our profits back to our communities. Our goal is to work as one team to fulfill our unique brand promise to our guests, wherever and whenever they choose to shop. For more information, visit corporate.target.com. Beware of Hiring Scams: Target will never ask you to submit personal information via a text message for a position. Target will only ask you to apply for positions through corporate.target.com/careers, or Workday, our applicant tracking system.
Loading...
Target Similar Companies
Charlotte-based Belk, Inc., a privately-owned department store, began when William Henry Belk opened his first store in 1888 with his brother, Dr. John Belk, joining as a partner. What started as two brothers in business has now grown into a legacy of selling great products at great prices, treating
Here at Wawa, the sky's the limit. Voted as “America’s Favorite Convenience Store,” Wawa operates a chain of convenience retail stores located in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, and Washington D.C. We're fa
Sainsbury's
Over 150 years old and still going strong, we’re the UK’s second-biggest retailer. Every day, the nation shops with us because they know they’ll get affordable, good food and excellent service. We focus on great value and convenient shopping across our family of brands, from Argos, Nectar and Habit
Tractor Supply Company
For more than 85 years, Tractor Supply has been passionate about serving the needs of recreational farmers, ranchers, homeowners, gardeners, pet enthusiasts and all those who enjoy living Life Out Here. Tractor Supply is the largest rural lifestyle retailer in the U.S., ranking 296 on the Fortune 50
Company Overview Headquartered in Knoxville, Tennessee, Pilot Flying J is the largest operator of travel centers in North America with more than 750 locations throughout the United States and Canada and employs more than 24,000 Team Members. Pilot Flying J services over a million guests every day.
Love's Travel Stops
Founded in 1964 by Tom Love, Love’s Family of Companies is headquartered in Oklahoma City, and remains entirely family-owned and operated. With more than 600 locations in 42 states, Love’s approximate growth rate is 40 stores per year. From the first filling station in Watonga, Oklahoma, the Love’s
Raia
Nossa página oficial no LinkedIn é https://bit.ly/2XT3eZl Fundada em 1905 na cidade de Araraquara, a Raia é uma das bandeiras da RD Saúde (Raia Drogasil S.A.) e possui mais de 1000 farmácias em todo o Brasil. A RD Saúde é um ecossistema de saúde integral, com 3 mil farmácias em todo o Brasil e neg
Auchan Retail
To create new-generation retailing that improves people’s lives, Auchan Retail places customers at the centre of its actions and reaffirms the retailer’s role: that of a multi-format, “phygital” activist for good, healthy, local produce that constantly reinvents itself to deliver a new customer expe
DICK'S Sporting Goods
YOU LIVE AND BREATHE SPORTS. SO DO WE. In work and in life. On the field, the court or the ice. Nothing wins like a commitment to excellence; to your team and your goals. At DICK’S Sporting Goods, it’s this kind of thinking that inspires our mission. Our culture is the result of people who give t
.png)
Target CyberSecurity News
November 10, 2025 06:09 PM
Italian Adviser Becomes Latest Target in Expanding Paragon Graphite Spyware Surveillance Case
Italian strategist Francesco Nicodemo targeted in Paragon spyware attack, exposing growing digital espionage on political figures.
November 10, 2025 03:43 PM
Chinese Cybersecurity Firm Data Breach Exposes State-Sponsored Hackers Cyber Weapons and Target List
In early November 2025, Knownsec, one of China's largest cybersecurity firms with direct government ties, experienced a catastrophic data...
November 10, 2025 10:08 AM
Data Breach at Chinese Cybersecurity Firm Reveals State-Backed Hacking Tools and Target Lists
Chinese data breach - On November 2, 2025, Knownsec, a prominent Chinese cybersecurity firm with established ties to the Chinese government.
November 10, 2025 09:11 AM
Large-Scale ClickFix Phishing Attacks Target Hotel Systems with PureRAT Malware
Cybersecurity researchers have called attention to a massive phishing campaign targeting the hospitality industry that lures hotel managers...
November 10, 2025 06:14 AM
Data Leak Exposes Chinese State-Sponsored Cyber Arsenal and Target Database
In early November 2025, a massive data breach at Knownsec, a prominent Chinese cybersecurity firm with government ties.
November 09, 2025 11:51 PM
Data breach at Chinese infosec firm reveals cyber-weapons and target list
Asia In Brief Chinese infosec blog MXRN last week reported a data breach at a security company called Knownsec that has ties to Beijing and...
November 05, 2025 11:20 AM
Mysterious 'SmudgedSerpent' Hackers Target U.S. Policy Experts Amid Iran–Israel Tensions
A never-before-seen threat activity cluster codenamed UNK_SmudgedSerpent has been attributed as behind a set of cyber attacks targeting...
November 03, 2025 09:04 AM
AI Becomes Both Tool and Target in Cybersecurity
OpenAI's new Aardvark system acts as an autonomous security researcher, scanning code, fixing flaws and testing patches.
October 24, 2025 07:00 AM
North Korean Threat Actors Target European Drone Makers
Researchers have identified a new wave of cybersecurity attacks against European drone makers by the Lazarus Group, a well-known and...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Target CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Target
The official website of Target is www.target.com/careers.
Target’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Target’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 655, reflecting their Weak security posture.
How many security badges does Target’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Target currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Target have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Target is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Target have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Target does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Target comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Target is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Target have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Target does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Target comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Target is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Target have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Target is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Target
Target operates primarily in the Retail industry.
Number of Employees at Target
Target employs approximately 165,627 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Target
Target presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Target’s LinkedIn Followers
Target’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 2,334,140 followers.
NAICS Classification of Target
Target is classified under the NAICS code 43, which corresponds to Retail Trade.
Target’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, Target has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/target.
Target’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Target maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/target.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Target
As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Target has experienced 32 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Target has an estimated 15,222 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Target ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach, Vulnerability, Ransomware and Cyber Attack.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Target ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $8.34 billion.
How does Target detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an communication strategy with public statement, and remediation measures with remediation efforts, and remediation measures with contractual safeguards (e.g., dora compliance), remediation measures with continuous monitoring, remediation measures with risk tiering, and enhanced monitoring with recommended for third-party vendors..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: The annual holiday shopping season may have seen the theft of around 40 million credit and debit card accounts belonging to Target consumers in the United States.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Card Swiping at Terminals
Motivation: Credit Card Theft
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: The US retail behemoth Target has agreed to pay $18.5 million to resolve the 2013 data breach in a settlement with the US Attorneys General. Target consumers' credit and debit card accounts totaling close to 40 million were compromised in 2013 during the customary holiday shopping season. The corporation plans to reimburse its clients for the expenses they have incurred as well as for any harm they have suffered. The business will give the full sum of money to each Attorney General participating in the investigations; the Illinois Attorney General will receive $1.2 million, and the Connecticut Attorney General, who is spearheading the lawsuit against the corporation, will receive about $1 million.
Date Detected: 2013-12
Type: Data Breach
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a significant cyber attack that exposed the payment information of 41 million customers and contact details for approximately 70 million individuals. The attackers initially gained entry into Target's network by launching a spear phishing attack on a third-party vendor to steal user credentials. With access secured, they strategically deployed malware to harvest customer data over a two-month period. The fallout from this breach was substantial for Target, both financially and reputationally. The breach's total costs approached $290 million, including a major settlement and various expenses related to breach remediation efforts. Additionally, the breach had significant leadership implications, contributing to the departure of Target's CEO. This event underscored the critical importance of robust cybersecurity measures, especially regarding third-party vendors and the protection of sensitive customer data.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor credentials
Motivation: Data Theft
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target became the victim of a significant cyber attack that compromised the payment cards of 41 million customers and the contact information of an additional 70 million customers. This breach, which resulted from a spear-phishing attack on a third-party vendor, enabled attackers to install malware that captured customer data over two months. The financial impact of the breach was monumental, costing Target approximately $290 million after including fines, remediation, consulting fees, and other related expenses. This incident led to the departure of Target's CEO and highlighted the catastrophic potential of cybersecurity threats. The settlement of country-wide claims alone amounted to $18.5 million, underscoring the extensive legal and financial ramifications of such breaches.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear-phishing attack on a third-party vendor
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target suffered one of the most significant cyber attacks in retail history, exposing 41 million payment cards and contact information for approximately 70 million customers.
Date Detected: 2013
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Stolen Credentials
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In one of the most significant retail cyberattacks, Target experienced a massive breach in 2013, exposing 41 million payment cards and contact details for about 70 million customers. The attackers initially targeted a third-party vendor using a spear phishing technique to obtain credentials. They then infiltrated Target's network, deploying malware to capture customer data over two months. This incident had profound repercussions, leading to the CEO's departure and resulting in fines and expenses around $290 million for the company. It underscored the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures to protect sensitive customer information and maintain consumer trust.
Date Detected: 2013-11-27
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2013-12-19
Date Resolved: 2013-12-19
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor credentials
Threat Actor: Unknown
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target experienced a devastating cyber attack that compromised the payment card details of 41 million customers along with the contact information of about 70 million individuals. This cyber incident is one of the most significant attacks in retail, highlighting the severe vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendors and the systemic risks within retail network infrastructures. The hackers initiated the breach through a spear phishing attack aimed at a third-party vendor, gaining unauthorized access to Target's network. Subsequently, they deployed malware to collect sensitive customer data over two months. The financial repercussions of this cyber attack were monumental, with Target incurring approximately $290 million in costs related to legal settlements, remediation efforts, consulting, and other associated expenses. The breach not only led to substantial financial losses but also severely damaged Target's reputation and trust with customers, marking a pivotal moment that emphasizes the importance of cybersecurity vigilance in the retail sector.
Date Detected: 2013
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor access
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In one of the most notable retail cyber attacks, Target experienced a devastating breach in 2013 that exposed 41 million payment cards and the contact information of roughly 70 million customers. The attackers employed a spear phishing technique to compromise a third-party vendor's network credentials. Once inside Target's network, they installed malware to capture customer payment data for two months. The breach had far-reaching consequences, including the departure of Target's CEO and fines totaling $18.5 million to resolve nationwide claims. The total cost to Target, considering remediation, consulting fees, and other related expenses, approximately amounted to $290 million. This incident underscores the critical importance of cybersecurity in the retail sector and highlights the vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendors.
Date Detected: 2013-12-15
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2013-12-19
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor's network credentials
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a massive cyber attack that became one of the most notorious in retail history. This breach exposed the payment card details of 41 million customers and contact information for an additional 29 million. The attackers gained access through a third-party vendor, leveraging a spear-phishing attack to steal credentials. Once inside Target’s network, they deployed malware that captured customer data over two months. The fallout from this breach was significant, leading to the departure of Target’s CEO and costing the company approximately $290 million in remediation, consulting fees, legal settlements, and other related expenses. The incident highlighted the vulnerabilities in the supply chain and the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures.
Date Detected: 2013-11-27
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2013-12-19
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear-phishing, Malware
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor access
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target faced a massive cyber attack that exposed 41 million payment cards and compromised contact information for approximately 70 million customers. This incident occurred when threat actors launched a spear phishing attack on a third-party vendor to steal user credentials. Having gained access to Target's network, the attackers then installed malware to capture customer payment information over a two-month period. The ramifications of this breach were severe; Target's CEO departed the organization, and the company had to settle fines totaling $18.5 million to resolve claims across the country. The total cost to Target, including expenses for remediation, consulting fees, and other payments, approached approximately $290 million. This cyber attack highlights the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures and the importance of vigilantly managing third-party risks.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor access
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, a sophisticated cyber attack on Target resulted in the exposure of 41 million payment cards and the contact information of approximately 70 million customers. This cyber assault was initiated through a spear phishing operation targeting a third-party vendor, aimed at acquiring user credentials. Once the attackers had breached Target's defenses, they deployed malware designed to capture customer data during transactions over a two-month period. The aftermath of this breach was profound, leading to the departure of the CEO and culminating in Target agreeing to pay fines totalling $18.5 million to settle claims from across the country. Ultimately, the breach led to the company incurring around $290 million in costs, encompassing fines, remediation efforts, consulting fees, and more.
Date Detected: 2013
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing, Malware
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor credentials
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target faced a monumental cybersecurity crisis when it became the victim of a cyber attack that exposed the payment card information of 41 million customers and personal contact information for approximately 70 million people. This breach was orchestrated through a spear-phishing attack on a third-party vendor, which allowed the attackers to access Target's network. Subsequently, malware was installed to collect customer data over two months. The repercussions were severe, resulting in the departure of Target's CEO and the company incurring costs upwards of $290 million. This included fines totalling $18.5 million to settle nationwide claims, remediation efforts, consulting fees, and other related expenses. This cyber attack underscores the critical importance of vigilant cybersecurity measures, especially in safeguarding third-party vendor connections and the need for robust systems to detect and prevent malware deployment.
Date Detected: 2013-12-15
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2013-12-19
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear-phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor access
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target fell victim to a cyber attack that compromised the payment cards and contact information of millions. Specifically, the breach exposed 41 million payment cards and the personal information of about 70 million customers. The initial point of attack was a third-party vendor, targeted through a spear phishing attempt to steal credentials. Upon gaining access to Target's network, the attackers deployed malware to capture customer data over two months. This incident led to significant financial and reputational damage for Target. The company faced extensive litigation and regulatory scrutiny across the country, culminating in fines and various costs. The CEO of Target subsequently left the company. To resolve claims nationwide, Target paid $18.5 million in fines, contributing to the total cost of approximately $290 million for the breach, including remediation, consulting fees, and other expenses.
Type: Data Breach, Malware
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Credentials Theft
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target experienced a severe cyber attack that exposed the payment card information of 41 million customers and the contact information for approximately 70 million customers. The breach was orchestrated via a spear phishing attack aimed at a third-party vendor, which allowed the attackers to compromise Target's network and install malware. This malware was then used to capture customer data over two months. The financial repercussions of the attack were substantial, with the overall cost to Target being approximately $290 million. This included fines, remediation efforts, consulting fees, and other various expenses. The breach not only resulted in significant financial losses but also led to the departure of Target's CEO and harmed the company's reputation among consumers.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor access
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: A major cyberattack on Target compromised the payment card data and contact information of millions of customers. The attackers gained access to Target's network through a spear phishing attack targeted at a third-party vendor. Utilizing the obtained credentials, they deployed malware to capture customer information over two months. This breach exposed 41 million payment cards and affected approximately 70 million individuals. The financial and reputational damage to Target was significant, with the costs for resolving the issue, including legal fines, settlements, and other expenses, amounting to roughly $290 million. Additionally, the breach led to the departure of Target's CEO and highlighted the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures in protecting customer data.
Date Detected: 2013
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor credentials
Motivation: Data Theft
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target fell victim to a significant cyber attack that compromised the payment card information of 41 million customers and the personal information of approximately 70 million customers. The attackers gained entry into Target's network by spear phishing a third-party vendor, ultimately installing malware to harvest customer data over two months. This breach, one of the largest in retail history, led to the CEO's departure and resulted in a combination of fines and remediation costs totaling approximately $290 million. Although Target settled country-wide claims for $18.5 million, the overall expense, including consulting and other related fees, pushed the cost close to $290 million. This event underscores the critical importance of cybersecurity vigilance, especially in protecting against sophisticated attack methods targeting third-party vendors.
Date Detected: 2013-11-27
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2013-12-19
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-Party Vendor
Threat Actor: Unknown
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target experienced a monumental cyber attack that compromised approximately 41 million payment cards and the contact details of roughly 70 million customers. This breach was executed through a spear phishing attack aimed at a third-party vendor, a method which allowed the attackers to steal user credentials and infiltrate Target's network. Once inside, they deployed malware to capture customer data over two months. The aftermath of this security breach was severe, with Target's CEO leaving the company and the organization facing fines totaling $18.5 million to settle nationwide claims. The total cost to Target, including remediation efforts, consulting fees, and various other related expenses, amounted to approximately $290 million.
Date Detected: 2013-11-27
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2013-12-19
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Stolen User Credentials
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In a significant breach in 2013, Target fell victim to cybercriminals who exposed payment information for 41 million customers and contact details for an additional 29 million. The attackers initiated their campaign by targeting a third-party vendor with a spear phishing attack, which was designed to steal the vendor’s credentials. With access to Target’s network, they deployed malware that allowed them to capture customer payment details over a two-month period. This attack not only led to the enormity of customer data being compromised but also had substantial financial repercussions for Target. With the total costs for the breach nearing $290 million due to legal, remediation, and consulting fees among others, this event underscores the critical need for rigorous cybersecurity measures, especially in guarding against third-party vulnerabilities. The breach prompted significant changes at Target, including the departure of its CEO and the payment of fines totaling $18.5 million to settle claims country-wide, highlighting the severe impact attacks can have on an organization's financial health and leadership.
Date Detected: 2013
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor credentials
Motivation: Financial GainData Theft
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target experienced a devastating cyber attack that compromised 41 million payment cards and the contact information of approximately 70 million customers. This breach occurred when threat actors launched a spear phishing attack on a third-party vendor, successfully stealing user credentials. With these credentials, the attackers were able to access Target's network and implant malware to capture customer data over two months. The repercussions of this breach were far-reaching, ultimately costing the company approximately $290 million in remediation, consulting fees, and fines, including an $18.5 million settlement to resolve claims nationwide. The CEO of Target left in the aftermath, highlighting the immense impact such an attack can have on corporate leadership and the company's reputation. This incident underscores the pressing need for robust cybersecurity measures, particularly for retailers holding vast amounts of sensitive customer information.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Stolen user credentials
Motivation: Data Theft
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target suffered one of the costliest cyber attacks in retail history, impacting 70 million customers. The breach exposed 41 million payment cards and leaked the contact information of approximately 70 million individuals. This sophisticated cyber attack began with a spear phishing attempt aimed at a third-party vendor, leading to compromised network access. By installing malware on Target’s system, cybercriminals captured vast amounts of customer data over two months. The incident had profound consequences for Target, including the departure of their CEO. Financially, the breach led to fines of $18.5 million and an approximate total cost of $290 million to the company, covering remediation, consulting fees, and settlements. This example underscores the high stakes of cybersecurity in the retail sector and the critical importance of safeguarding against third-party vulnerabilities and maintaining robust protection measures.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor access
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target faced a catastrophic cyber attack that compromised the personal and payment information of millions of customers. The breach exposed information related to 41 million payment cards and contact details for about 70 million individuals. This massive security lapse was initiated via a spear phishing attack aimed at a third-party vendor, which then allowed the attackers to infiltrate Target's network. Over two months, malware installed on the network captured vast amounts of customer data, wreaking havoc on the company's reputation and financial standing. The fallout from this event was profound, leading to the departure of the CEO and costing the company approximately $290 million in fines, remediation efforts, consultancy fees, and other related expenses. The Target cyber attack serves as a stark reminder of the critical importance of cybersecurity vigilance and the far-reaching consequences of security failures.
Type: Data Breach, Malware
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing, Third-Party Vendor
Title: Target Data Breach 2013
Description: A massive cybersecurity breach that exposed the payment card information of 41 million customers and contact information for an additional 29 million individuals.
Date Detected: 2013
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2013
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing, Malware
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor credentials
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a monumental cyber attack that exposed the payment card information of 41 million customers along with the contact information for approximately another 70 million. This attack was orchestrated through a spear phishing campaign targeted at a third-party vendor. By securing credentials from this vendor, the attackers gained access to Target's network. Over a two-month period, malware installed within the system collected vast amounts of customer data. The breach not only led to the departure of Target's CEO but also incurred substantial financial costs for the company. Target resolved claims across the country by paying fines totaling $18.5 million. Including the expenses for remediation efforts, consulting services, and other associated payments, the total cost of the breach approximated $290 million. This incident underscores the vital importance of cybersecurity vigilance and the necessity for robust protection measures to safeguard against sophisticated cyber threats.
Date Detected: 2013
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor credentials
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a considerable cybersecurity breach that exposed 41 million payment cards and the contact information of approximately 70 million customers. Using a spear phishing attack on a third-party vendor to harvest user credentials, attackers accessed Target's network and installed malware to capture customer data over two months. This breach significantly impacted Target, leading to the CEO's departure and costs approximating $290 million when considering fines, remediation, consulting fees, and other related expenses. The breach underscored the vital importance of robust cybersecurity measures and the complexities involved in protecting customer data, especially for large retail organizations.
Date Detected: 2013-11-27
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2013-12-19
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear PhishingMalware
Vulnerability Exploited: Harvested user credentials
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In one of the most significant retail cyber attacks, Target faced a devastating breach in 2013 that exposed 41 million payment cards and contact information for approximately 70 million customers. Utilizing a spear phishing attack aimed at a third-party vendor to gain network access, attackers deployed malware to capture customer data over two months. The aftermath of this breach saw the departure of Target’s CEO and the company incurring costs around $290 million. This included fines of $18.5 million to settle nationwide claims, alongside expenses for remediation, consulting, and other related payments. The breach not only highlighted the vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendors but also emphasized the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures in protecting sensitive customer information.
Date Detected: 2013
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2013
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor access
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target faced a catastrophic cyber attack, marking one of the most substantial retail security breaches in history. The breach exposed sensitive information of approximately 41 million payment cards and personal details of roughly 70 million customers. This cyber onslaught began with a spear-phishing attack targeting a third-party vendor, which led to the compromise of Target's network. Once inside, the attackers deployed malware to harvest vast amounts of customer data over two months. The financial ramifications were staggering, with the breach's total cost nearing $290 million, including fines, settlements, remediation efforts, consulting fees, and more. Beyond the monetary impact, the breach severely tarnished Target's brand and led to the departure of its CEO. The incident underscores the critical importance of robust cybersecurity measures, especially concerning third-party vendor management and network security.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear-phishing attack
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor network compromise
Motivation: Data theft
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a substantial cyber attack, affecting 41 million payment cards and compromising the personal information of approximately 70 million customers. This attack, orchestrated via a spear phishing campaign targeting a third-party vendor, allowed the attackers to infiltrate Target's network. Subsequently, they deployed malware to capture customer payment information over two months. The attack not only led to the CEO's departure but also resulted in significant financial repercussions for Target. The company incurred around $290 million in costs, encompassing fines, remediation efforts, consulting fees, and other related expenses, in an attempt to mitigate the damage and resolve nationwide claims brought against it.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party Vendor
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In December 2013, Target fell victim to one of the largest retail cyber attacks in history. The attack exposed payment card information of 41 million customers and contact details for an additional 29 million. Utilizing a spear phishing technique, attackers initially compromised a third-party vendor's credentials, providing them with access to Target's network. Subsequently, malware was installed to collect customer payment data across a two-month period. This breach not only led to significant financial losses amounting to approximately $290 million but also resulted in the departure of Target's CEO and country-wide fines totaling $18.5 million. Remediation efforts, consulting, and various associated expenses substantially increased the cost of this breach.
Date Detected: 2013-12-01
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Compromised third-party vendor credentials
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a massive data breach that impacted 41 million payment cards and exposed the contact information of approximately 70 million customers. This cyber attack was executed through a spear phishing campaign targeted at a third-party vendor, which allowed the attackers to gain access to Target's network. By installing malware, they were able to capture customer data over two months. The breach not only led to the CEO's departure but also incurred around $290 million in costs to the company, including fines, settlements, and other remediation expenses. This attack underscores the critical importance of cybersecurity in protecting sensitive customer information and maintaining trust.
Date Detected: 2013-11-27
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2013-12-19
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing, Malware
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor access
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In 2013, Target suffered a monumental cyber attack that compromised 41 million payment cards and contact information for roughly 70 million customers. This incident made headlines for its scale and the method of attack. Threat actors executed a spear phishing operation against a third-party vendor to gain credentials and access Target's network. Subsequently, malware was installed to harvest customer payment data over two months. The aftermath of this breach was severe, with Target's CEO leaving the company and the organization incurring approximately $290 million in costs related to fines, remediation efforts, consulting fees, and other associated expenses. The breach not only highlighted the vulnerabilities in supply chain security but also underscored the significant financial and reputational risks associated with cyber attacks on large retail operators.
Date Detected: 2013
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor credentials
Motivation: Financial
Title: Target Corporation Data Breach
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Target Corporation on December 20, 2013. The breach occurred between November 27 and December 15, 2013, resulting from unauthorized access to payment card data, with compromised information including customer names, credit or debit card numbers, expiration dates, and CVVs. The number of individuals affected is unknown.
Date Detected: 2013-12-20
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2013-12-20
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Title: Third-Party Cybersecurity Breaches in Europe’s Top Firms (2023)
Description: A staggering 98% of Europe’s top 100 firms suffered third-party breaches in the last year, highlighting the critical yet underestimated risk posed by suppliers, platforms, and partners. These breaches often stem from inadequate vetting, poor visibility into vendor security practices, and lack of continuous monitoring. Attackers exploit third-party vulnerabilities to bypass hardened defenses, leading to operational disruption, reputational damage, and regulatory penalties. Notable examples include the Target breach (via a compromised HVAC vendor) and recent retail breaches originating from third-party providers. The financial sector faces heightened risks under regulations like DORA, which mandate robust third-party risk management frameworks.
Type: Third-Party Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Vendor SystemsInadequate VettingLack of Continuous MonitoringExploitation of Weak Supply Chain Links
Vulnerability Exploited: Poor Vendor Security PracticesInsufficient Contractual SafeguardsLack of Real-Time Threat Detection
Motivation: Financial GainData TheftOperational Disruption
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Card Swiping at Terminals, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor credentials, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-Party Vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor credentials, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Third-party Vendor, Third-party vendor credentials, Third-party vendor, Third-party vendor, Compromised Third-Party Vendor (e.g. and HVAC vendor in Target breach).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR1059231023
Data Compromised: Credit and Debit Card Information
Payment Information Risk: ['Credit Card Information', 'Debit Card Information']
Incident : Data Breach TAR1924211123
Financial Loss: $18.5 million
Data Compromised: 40 million credit and debit card accounts
Legal Liabilities: Attorneys General lawsuit
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR734042824
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment information of 41 million customers, Contact details of 70 million individuals
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR211042924
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment cards of 41 million customers and contact information of 70 million customers
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR315050424
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment card information and contact information
Brand Reputation Impact: Severe
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million in fines
Incident : Data Breach TAR318050424
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact details
Systems Affected: Point-of-Sale (POS) Systems
Operational Impact: CEO's departure
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant
Identity Theft Risk: High
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR514050424
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment card details, Contact information
Brand Reputation Impact: Severely damaged
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR245050524
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: 41 million payment cards, Contact information of 70 million customers
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million in fines
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR245050524
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment card details, Contact information
Operational Impact: Departure of Target’s CEO
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant
Legal Liabilities: Legal settlements
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR246050524
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: 41 million payment cards, Contact information for 70 million customers
Brand Reputation Impact: Severe
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million in fines
Identity Theft Risk: High
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR600050524
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: 41 million payment cards, 70 million customers' contact information
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR802050524
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment card information, Personal contact information
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million in fines
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach, Malware TAR001050624
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: 41 million payment cards, 70 million customers' personal information
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant
Legal Liabilities: Extensive litigation and regulatory scrutiny
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR307050624
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment card information of 41 million customers, Contact information of 70 million customers
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant harm to the company's reputation
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR316050624
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment card data, Contact information
Operational Impact: Departure of Target's CEO
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant
Legal Liabilities: Legal finesSettlements
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR323050624
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment card information, Personal information
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million
Identity Theft Risk: High
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR203050624
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: 41 million payment cards, 70 million customer contact details
Operational Impact: CEO resignation
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million in fines
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050624
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment information for 41 million customers, Contact details for 29 million additional customers
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million in fines
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR204050724
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: 41 million payment cards, 70 million customer contact information
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million settlement
Incident : Data Breach TAR300050724
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: 41 million payment cards, Contact information of 70 million individuals
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million in fines
Incident : Data Breach, Malware TAR407050724
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: 41 million payment cards, contact details for 70 million individuals
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR603050724
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact information
Operational Impact: Departure of the company's CEO
Incident : Data Breach TAR700050724
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact information
Operational Impact: Departure of Target's CEO
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million in fines
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR416050724
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: 41 million payment cards, Contact information of 70 million customers
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR900050724
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: 41 million payment cards and contact information for 70 million customers
Operational Impact: Departure of Target’s CEO
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million in fines
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR901050724
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: 41 million payment cards and personal details of 70 million customers
Brand Reputation Impact: Severe tarnishing of brand
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR204050824
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment information, Personal information
Brand Reputation Impact: CEO's departure
Legal Liabilities: FinesNationwide claims
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050824
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact details
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million in fines
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR941050824
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact information
Brand Reputation Impact: High
Legal Liabilities: Fines, settlements
Identity Theft Risk: High
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR708050824
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: 41 million payment cards and contact information for 70 million customers
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR443072925
Data Compromised: Customer names, Credit or debit card numbers, Expiration dates, Cvvs
Payment Information Risk: True
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Financial Loss: Over $200 million (e.g., Target breach)
Data Compromised: Customer data, Sensitive business information
Operational Impact: Significant disruption (e.g., business continuity risks)
Customer Complaints: Loss of consumer trust (e.g., Target breach)
Brand Reputation Impact: Irreversible reputational damage
Legal Liabilities: Regulatory PenaltiesNon-Compliance with DORA (for financial sector)
Identity Theft Risk: High (due to compromised PII in breaches like Target)
Payment Information Risk: High (e.g., Target breach involved payment card data)
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $260.58 million.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Credit Card Information, Debit Card Information, , Credit and debit card information, Payment Information, Contact Details, , Payment Cards, Contact Information, , Payment Card Information, Contact Information, , Payment Card Information, Contact Details, , Payment Card Details, Contact Information, , Payment Card Information, Contact Information, , Payment Card Details, Contact Information, , Payment Card Information, Contact Information, , Payment Card Information, Customer Contact Information, , Payment Card Information, Personal Contact Information, , Payment Card Information, Personal Information, , Payment Card Information, Contact Information, , Payment Card Data, Contact Information, , Payment Card Information, Personal Information, , Payment Card Information, Customer Contact Details, , Payment Information, Contact Details, , Payment Card Information, Customer Contact Information, , Payment Card Information, Contact Information, , Payment card information, Contact details, Payment Card Information, Contact Information, , Payment Card Information, Contact Information, , Payment Card Information, Contact Information, , Payment Card Information, Contact Information, , Payment Card Information, Personal Details, , Payment Information, Personal Information, , Payment Card Information, Contact Details, , Payment Card Information, Contact Information, , Payment card information, contact information, Customer Names, Credit Or Debit Card Numbers, Expiration Dates, Cvvs, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Payment Card Data, Sensitive Business Data and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR1059231023
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 40 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR1924211123
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 40 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR734042824
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 110 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR211042924
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Customers Affected: 111 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR315050424
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail Company
Industry: Retail
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR318050424
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR514050424
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Customers Affected: 41 million payment card details, 70 million contact information
Incident : Data Breach TAR245050524
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR245050524
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retailer
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR246050524
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retailer
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR600050524
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR802050524
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retailer
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 110 million
Incident : Data Breach, Malware TAR001050624
Entity Name: Target Corporation
Entity Type: Retailer
Industry: Retail
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR307050624
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retailer
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR316050624
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 70 million individuals
Incident : Data Breach TAR323050624
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR203050624
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050624
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail Corporation
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 41 million (payment information), 29 million (contact details)
Incident : Data Breach TAR204050724
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retailer
Industry: Retail
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR300050724
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach, Malware TAR407050724
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Location: USA
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR603050724
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retailer
Industry: Retail
Customers Affected: 70000000
Incident : Data Breach TAR700050724
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retailer
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 41 million (payment card information), 70 million (contact information)
Incident : Data Breach TAR416050724
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR900050724
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR901050724
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR204050824
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050824
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR941050824
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR708050824
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR443072925
Entity Name: Target Corporation
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Entity Name: Europe’s Top 100 Firms (98% affected)
Entity Type: Corporations, Financial Institutions, Retailers
Industry: Multiple (e.g., Retail, Finance, Technology)
Location: Europe
Size: Large Enterprises
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Entity Name: Target Corporation
Entity Type: Retailer
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large Enterprise
Customers Affected: Millions (payment card data compromised)
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR1059231023
Communication Strategy: Public Statement
Incident : Data Breach TAR700050724
Remediation Measures: Remediation efforts
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Remediation Measures: Contractual Safeguards (e.g., DORA compliance)Continuous MonitoringRisk Tiering
Enhanced Monitoring: Recommended for third-party vendors
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR1059231023
Type of Data Compromised: Credit card information, Debit card information
Number of Records Exposed: 40 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR1924211123
Type of Data Compromised: Credit and debit card information
Number of Records Exposed: 40 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR734042824
Type of Data Compromised: Payment information, Contact details
Number of Records Exposed: 110 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR211042924
Type of Data Compromised: Payment cards, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 111 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR315050424
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million payment cards, 70 million customers
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR318050424
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact details
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million payment cards, 70 million contact details
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR514050424
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card details, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million, 70 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Contact information
Incident : Data Breach TAR245050524
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million payment cards, 70 million customers
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR245050524
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card details, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 70 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR246050524
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 111 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR600050524
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Customer contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 111 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR802050524
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Personal contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 110 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach, Malware TAR001050624
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Personal information
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million payment cards, 70 million customers' personal information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR307050624
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million, 70 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR316050624
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card data, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 70 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR323050624
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Personal information
Number of Records Exposed: 70 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR203050624
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Customer contact details
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million payment cards, 70 million customer contact details
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050624
Type of Data Compromised: Payment information, Contact details
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million, 29 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR204050724
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Customer contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million payment cards, 70 million customer contact information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR300050724
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million payment cards, 70 million individuals
Incident : Data Breach, Malware TAR407050724
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact details
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million payment cards, 70 million contact details
Personally Identifiable Information: Contact details
Incident : Data Breach TAR603050724
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 70000000
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR700050724
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million (payment card information), 70 million (contact information)
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR416050724
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million payment cards, 70 million contact information records
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR900050724
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million payment cards and 70 million contact information records
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Contact Information
Incident : Data Breach TAR901050724
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Personal details
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million, 70 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR204050824
Type of Data Compromised: Payment information, Personal information
Number of Records Exposed: 110 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050824
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact details
Number of Records Exposed: 70 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR941050824
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million, 70 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR708050824
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, contact information
Number of Records Exposed: 41 million payment cards, 70 million contact information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR443072925
Type of Data Compromised: Customer names, Credit or debit card numbers, Expiration dates, Cvvs
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Payment card data, Sensitive business data
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Likely (e.g., Target breach involved exfiltration)
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (e.g., customer names, payment details)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Remediation efforts, Contractual Safeguards (e.g., DORA compliance), Continuous Monitoring, Risk Tiering, .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR1924211123
Legal Actions: Lawsuit by Attorneys General
Incident : Data Breach TAR315050424
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR318050424
Fines Imposed: $290 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR245050524
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR246050524
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR600050524
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR802050524
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Incident : Data Breach, Malware TAR001050624
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Legal Actions: Extensive litigation
Incident : Data Breach TAR323050624
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR203050624
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050624
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR204050724
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million settlement
Incident : Data Breach TAR300050724
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Incident : Data Breach, Malware TAR407050724
Fines Imposed: $290 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR700050724
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR900050724
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050824
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Regulations Violated: Potential GDPR (for European firms), DORA (for financial institutions),
Regulatory Notifications: Mandated under DORA for financial sector breaches
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Lawsuit by Attorneys General, Extensive litigation, Nationwide claims, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR734042824
Lessons Learned: Critical importance of robust cybersecurity measures, especially regarding third-party vendors and the protection of sensitive customer data.
Incident : Data Breach TAR315050424
Lessons Learned: The critical importance of cybersecurity vigilance and the potential consequences of oversight or failure within the supply chain.
Incident : Data Breach TAR318050424
Lessons Learned: The incident underscored the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures to protect sensitive customer information and maintain consumer trust.
Incident : Data Breach TAR514050424
Lessons Learned: Importance of cybersecurity vigilance in the retail sector, especially with third-party vendors.
Incident : Data Breach TAR245050524
Lessons Learned: The importance of cybersecurity in the retail sector and the vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendors.
Incident : Data Breach TAR245050524
Lessons Learned: Vulnerabilities in the supply chain and the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures
Incident : Data Breach TAR246050524
Lessons Learned: The critical need for robust cybersecurity measures and the importance of vigilantly managing third-party risks.
Incident : Data Breach TAR802050524
Lessons Learned: The critical importance of vigilant cybersecurity measures, especially in safeguarding third-party vendor connections and the need for robust systems to detect and prevent malware deployment.
Incident : Data Breach TAR316050624
Lessons Learned: Critical need for robust cybersecurity measures in protecting customer data.
Incident : Data Breach TAR323050624
Lessons Learned: Critical importance of cybersecurity vigilance, especially in protecting against sophisticated attack methods targeting third-party vendors.
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050624
Lessons Learned: Rigorous cybersecurity measures, especially in guarding against third-party vulnerabilities
Incident : Data Breach TAR204050724
Lessons Learned: The need for robust cybersecurity measures, particularly for retailers holding vast amounts of sensitive customer information.
Incident : Data Breach TAR300050724
Lessons Learned: The critical importance of safeguarding against third-party vulnerabilities and maintaining robust protection measures.
Incident : Data Breach, Malware TAR407050724
Lessons Learned: Critical importance of cybersecurity vigilance and the far-reaching consequences of security failures.
Incident : Data Breach TAR603050724
Lessons Learned: Importance of robust cybersecurity practices, especially regarding third-party vendor management and the protection of customer data.
Incident : Data Breach TAR700050724
Lessons Learned: Cybersecurity vigilance and robust protection measures are crucial to safeguard against sophisticated cyber threats.
Incident : Data Breach TAR416050724
Lessons Learned: Importance of robust cybersecurity measures and complexities in protecting customer data for large retail organizations.
Incident : Data Breach TAR900050724
Lessons Learned: The critical need for robust cybersecurity measures in protecting sensitive customer information and the vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendors
Incident : Data Breach TAR901050724
Lessons Learned: The critical importance of robust cybersecurity measures, especially concerning third-party vendor management and network security.
Incident : Data Breach TAR941050824
Lessons Learned: Critical importance of cybersecurity in protecting sensitive customer information and maintaining trust.
Incident : Data Breach TAR708050824
Lessons Learned: Vulnerabilities in supply chain security, significant financial and reputational risks associated with cyber attacks on large retail operators
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Lessons Learned: Third-party risk must be treated as a strategic priority, not a checkbox., Comprehensive due diligence and continuous monitoring are critical., Contractual safeguards (e.g., DORA) must define roles, access rights, and breach notification timelines., Risk tiering helps prioritize high-risk vendors., Incident response plans must integrate third-party coordination.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Recommendations: Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Critical importance of robust cybersecurity measures, especially regarding third-party vendors and the protection of sensitive customer data.The critical importance of cybersecurity vigilance and the potential consequences of oversight or failure within the supply chain.The incident underscored the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures to protect sensitive customer information and maintain consumer trust.Importance of cybersecurity vigilance in the retail sector, especially with third-party vendors.The importance of cybersecurity in the retail sector and the vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendors.Vulnerabilities in the supply chain and the critical need for robust cybersecurity measuresThe critical need for robust cybersecurity measures and the importance of vigilantly managing third-party risks.The critical importance of vigilant cybersecurity measures, especially in safeguarding third-party vendor connections and the need for robust systems to detect and prevent malware deployment.Critical need for robust cybersecurity measures in protecting customer data.Critical importance of cybersecurity vigilance, especially in protecting against sophisticated attack methods targeting third-party vendors.Rigorous cybersecurity measures, especially in guarding against third-party vulnerabilitiesThe need for robust cybersecurity measures, particularly for retailers holding vast amounts of sensitive customer information.The critical importance of safeguarding against third-party vulnerabilities and maintaining robust protection measures.Critical importance of cybersecurity vigilance and the far-reaching consequences of security failures.Importance of robust cybersecurity practices, especially regarding third-party vendor management and the protection of customer data.Cybersecurity vigilance and robust protection measures are crucial to safeguard against sophisticated cyber threats.Importance of robust cybersecurity measures and complexities in protecting customer data for large retail organizations.The critical need for robust cybersecurity measures in protecting sensitive customer information and the vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendorsThe critical importance of robust cybersecurity measures, especially concerning third-party vendor management and network security.Critical importance of cybersecurity in protecting sensitive customer information and maintaining trust.Vulnerabilities in supply chain security, significant financial and reputational risks associated with cyber attacks on large retail operatorsThird-party risk must be treated as a strategic priority, not a checkbox.,Comprehensive due diligence and continuous monitoring are critical.,Contractual safeguards (e.g., DORA) must define roles, access rights, and breach notification timelines.,Risk tiering helps prioritize high-risk vendors.,Incident response plans must integrate third-party coordination.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality. and Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR318050424
Source: Various
Incident : Data Breach TAR941050824
Source: Media Reports
Incident : Data Breach TAR443072925
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2013-12-20
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Source: Target Data Breach Case Study
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Source: Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) Guidelines
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Various, and Source: Media Reports, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2013-12-20, and Source: Target Data Breach Case Study, and Source: Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) Guidelines.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR318050424
Investigation Status: Resolved
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Statement.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR1059231023
Customer Advisories: Public Statement
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Customer Advisories: Transparency in breach notifications to rebuild trust (e.g., post-Target breach)
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Public Statement, Transparency In Breach Notifications To Rebuild Trust (E.G., Post-Target Breach) and .
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR1059231023
Entry Point: Card Swiping at Terminals
Incident : Data Breach TAR734042824
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR315050424
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR318050424
Entry Point: Third-party vendor credentials
Incident : Data Breach TAR514050424
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR245050524
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR245050524
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR246050524
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR600050524
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR802050524
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach, Malware TAR001050624
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR307050624
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR316050624
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR323050624
Entry Point: Third-Party Vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR203050624
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050624
Entry Point: Third-party vendor credentials
Incident : Data Breach TAR204050724
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR300050724
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach, Malware TAR407050724
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR603050724
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR700050724
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR416050724
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR900050724
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR901050724
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR204050824
Entry Point: Third-party Vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050824
Entry Point: Third-party vendor credentials
Incident : Data Breach TAR941050824
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR708050824
Entry Point: Third-party vendor
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Entry Point: Compromised Third-Party Vendor (E.G., Hvac Vendor In Target Breach),
High Value Targets: Customer Data, Payment Systems, Sensitive Business Operations,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Customer Data, Payment Systems, Sensitive Business Operations,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR734042824
Root Causes: Spear phishing attack on third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR315050424
Root Causes: Spear phishing campaign targeting a third-party vendor to steal credentials
Incident : Data Breach TAR318050424
Root Causes: Third-party vendor credentials obtained through spear phishing
Incident : Data Breach TAR514050424
Root Causes: Vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendors and systemic risks within retail network infrastructures.
Incident : Data Breach TAR245050524
Root Causes: Compromised third-party vendor's network credentials
Incident : Data Breach TAR245050524
Root Causes: Spear-phishing attack, Third-party vendor access
Incident : Data Breach TAR246050524
Root Causes: Spear phishing attack on a third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR802050524
Root Causes: Spear-phishing attack on a third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach, Malware TAR001050624
Root Causes: Spear phishing leading to credentials theft
Incident : Data Breach TAR316050624
Root Causes: Spear phishing attack on third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR323050624
Root Causes: Spear Phishing of Third-Party Vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050624
Root Causes: Third-party vendor vulnerabilities
Incident : Data Breach TAR204050724
Root Causes: Spear phishing attack on a third-party vendor leading to stolen user credentials
Incident : Data Breach TAR300050724
Root Causes: Spear phishing attempt aimed at a third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR700050724
Root Causes: Spear phishing campaign targeted at a third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR416050724
Root Causes: Spear Phishing Attack On Third-Party Vendor, Malware Installation,
Incident : Data Breach TAR900050724
Root Causes: Vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendors
Incident : Data Breach TAR901050724
Root Causes: Spear-phishing attack on a third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR204050824
Root Causes: Spear Phishing Campaign, Third-Party Vendor Compromise,
Incident : Data Breach TAR941050824
Root Causes: Spear phishing campaign targeted at a third-party vendor
Incident : Data Breach TAR708050824
Root Causes: Weakness in third-party vendor security
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Root Causes: Inadequate Third-Party Vetting And Security Assessments., Lack Of Visibility Into Vendor Security Practices., Over-Reliance On Compliance Checkboxes Rather Than Proactive Risk Management., Failure To Integrate Third Parties Into Incident Response Plans.,
Corrective Actions: Implement Robust Tprm Programs With Continuous Monitoring., Enforce Contractual Safeguards (E.G., Dora Compliance)., Tier Vendors By Risk And Prioritize High-Risk Relationships., Integrate Third Parties Into Incident Response Frameworks., Foster A Culture Of Shared Responsibility And Digital Trust.,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Recommended for third-party vendors.
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Implement Robust Tprm Programs With Continuous Monitoring., Enforce Contractual Safeguards (E.G., Dora Compliance)., Tier Vendors By Risk And Prioritize High-Risk Relationships., Integrate Third Parties Into Incident Response Frameworks., Foster A Culture Of Shared Responsibility And Digital Trust., .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Unknown and Unknown.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2013-12.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2013-12-20.
What was the most recent incident resolved ?
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on 2013-12-19.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was $290 million.
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Credit and Debit Card Information, 40 million credit and debit card accounts, Payment information of 41 million customers, Contact details of 70 million individuals, , Payment cards of 41 million customers and contact information of 70 million customers, Payment card information and contact information, Payment card information, Contact details, , Payment card details, Contact information, , 41 million payment cards, contact information of 70 million customers, , Payment card details, Contact information, , 41 million payment cards, Contact information for 70 million customers, , 41 million payment cards, 70 million customers' contact information, , Payment card information, Personal contact information, , 41 million payment cards, 70 million customers' personal information, , Payment card information of 41 million customers, Contact information of 70 million customers, , Payment card data, Contact information, , Payment Card Information, Personal Information, , 41 million payment cards, 70 million customer contact details, , Payment information for 41 million customers, Contact details for 29 million additional customers, , 41 million payment cards, 70 million customer contact information, , 41 million payment cards, contact information of 70 million individuals, , 41 million payment cards, contact details for 70 million individuals, Payment card information, Contact information, , Payment card information, Contact information, , 41 million payment cards, Contact information of 70 million customers, , 41 million payment cards and contact information for 70 million customers, 41 million payment cards and personal details of 70 million customers, Payment information, Personal information, , Payment card information, Contact details, , Payment card information, Contact information, , 41 million payment cards and contact information for 70 million customers, Customer names, Credit or debit card numbers, Expiration dates, CVVs, , Customer Data, Sensitive Business Information and .
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Contact details for 29 million additional customers, Credit and Debit Card Information, Contact details, 70 million customer contact details, Payment card information, 70 million customers' contact information, 41 million payment cards and contact information for 70 million customers, Contact information for 70 million customers, CVVs, 70 million customer contact information, Payment information for 41 million customers, Personal information, Payment card information and contact information, Payment card data, Contact information, Contact details of 70 million individuals, 70 million customers' personal information, 40 million credit and debit card accounts, 41 million payment cards, contact details for 70 million individuals, 41 million payment cards, Payment card details, Contact information of 70 million customers, contact information of 70 million individuals, Personal contact information, Customer names, Credit or debit card numbers, Payment cards of 41 million customers and contact information of 70 million customers, Payment Card Information, 41 million payment cards and personal details of 70 million customers, Personal Information, Payment card information of 41 million customers, Customer Data, Sensitive Business Information, contact information of 70 million customers, Expiration dates, Payment information and Payment information of 41 million customers.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 2.9B.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation ?
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was $18.5 million, $290 million, $18.5 million, $18.5 million, $18.5 million, $18.5 million, $18.5 million, $18.5 million, $18.5 million, $18.5 million, $18.5 million settlement, $18.5 million, $290 million, $18.5 million, $18.5 million, Yes, $18.5 million.
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Lawsuit by Attorneys General, Extensive litigation, Nationwide claims, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Incident response plans must integrate third-party coordination.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality. and Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are California Office of the Attorney General, Target Data Breach Case Study, Various, Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) Guidelines and Media Reports.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Resolved.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Public Statement, Transparency in breach notifications to rebuild trust (e.g. and post-Target breach).
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an Third-party Vendor, Third-Party Vendor, Third-party vendor, Card Swiping at Terminals and Third-party vendor credentials.
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Spear phishing attack on third-party vendor, Spear phishing campaign targeting a third-party vendor to steal credentials, Third-party vendor credentials obtained through spear phishing, Vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendors and systemic risks within retail network infrastructures., Compromised third-party vendor's network credentials, Spear-phishing attack, Third-party vendor access, Spear phishing attack on a third-party vendor, Spear-phishing attack on a third-party vendor, Spear phishing leading to credentials theft, Spear phishing attack on third-party vendor, Spear Phishing of Third-Party Vendor, Third-party vendor vulnerabilities, Spear phishing attack on a third-party vendor leading to stolen user credentials, Spear phishing attempt aimed at a third-party vendor, Spear phishing campaign targeted at a third-party vendor, Spear phishing attack on third-party vendorMalware installation, Vulnerabilities associated with third-party vendors, Spear-phishing attack on a third-party vendor, Spear phishing campaignThird-party vendor compromise, Spear phishing campaign targeted at a third-party vendor, Weakness in third-party vendor security, Inadequate third-party vetting and security assessments.Lack of visibility into vendor security practices.Over-reliance on compliance checkboxes rather than proactive risk management.Failure to integrate third parties into incident response plans..
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Implement robust TPRM programs with continuous monitoring.Enforce contractual safeguards (e.g., DORA compliance).Tier vendors by risk and prioritize high-risk relationships.Integrate third parties into incident response frameworks.Foster a culture of shared responsibility and digital trust..
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=target' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
