Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TARARE BOISTARARE BOIS
VS
HolcimHolcim
TARARE BOIS

TARARE BOIS

444, Rue de la Noyeraie, Sarcey, 69490, FR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tararebois.fr
749/1000Moderate

Depuis 1974, Tarare Bois, filiale de VINCI Construction, met à disposition de ses clients son expertise et son savoir faire dans la réalisation de coffrages sur mesure, en bois, aluminium, PVC et polystyrène répondant aux exigences des chantiers de bâtiment et d'ouvrage...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:23
Subsidiaries:123
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Holcim

Holcim

Grafenauweg 10, Zug, CH, 6300

Last Update: 17/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.holcim.com/
804/1000Good

Holcim is the leading partner for sustainable construction with net sales of CHF 15.7 billion in 2025, creating value across the built environment from infrastructure and industry to buildings. We have more than 45 000 employees in 43 attractive markets – across Europ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:41,824
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TARARE BOIS

TARARE BOIS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Holcim

Holcim

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TARARE BOIS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holcim in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TARARE BOIS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TARARE BOIS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Holcim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holcim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TARARE BOIS

TARARE BOIS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Holcim

Holcim

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TARARE BOIS company and Holcim company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TARARE BOIS company and Holcim company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TARARE BOIS company and Holcim company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TARARE BOIS company and Holcim company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TARARE BOIS company and Holcim company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TARARE BOIS company and Holcim company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TARARE BOIS company and Holcim company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TARARE BOIS company and Holcim company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TARARE BOIS company and Holcim company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TARARE BOIS company and Holcim company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TARARE BOIS company and Holcim company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TARARE BOIS and Holcim, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TARARE BOIS and Holcim, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TARARE BOIS or Holcim ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TARARE BOIS or Holcim ?
Between TARARE BOIS and Holcim, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TARARE BOIS and Holcim, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3