Comparison Overview
Tank Storage Magazine

Tank Storage Magazine
124 Middleton Road, Morden, SM4 6RU, GB
Last Update: 16/01/2026
Tank Storage Magazine is the leading industry publication dedicated exclusively to the bulk liquid storage sector. Published 5 times a year, the publication is read by CEOs, terminal managers, business development managers and senior engineers within the oil, gas and pe...

Aker Solutions
Oksenøyveien 8, Fornebu, NO-1360, NO
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Aker Solutions delivers integrated solutions, products and services to the global energy industry. We enable low-carbon oil and gas production and develop renewable solutions to meet future energy needs. By combining innovative digital solutions and predictable project ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Tank Storage Magazine







Aker Solutions






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tank Storage Magazine in 2026.
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aker Solutions in 2026.
Incident History - Tank Storage Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tank Storage Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aker Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aker Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Tank Storage Magazine

Aker Solutions
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.