Comparison Overview
Chippin

Chippin
Ünalan Mah. Ayazma Cad., Istanbul, 34700, TR
Last Update: 21/04/2026
Bir Koç Topluluğu şirketi olarak 23 yıllık köklü geçmişimle kendimizi yeni nesil dijital ekonomi ve teknoloji şirketi olarak tanımlıyoruz. Web, mağaza ve mobil platformları kapsayan entegre CRM, pazarlama ve sadakat çözümleri sunuyor, bu alanlarda veriden değer yaratıyo...

Personal
Calle General Hornos 690, Comuna 1, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, AR, 1272
Last Update: 27/05/2026
En Personal, ponemos a las personas en el centro. Somos el ecosistema de servicios de Telecom Argentina S.A. que conecta a cada persona con todo lo que le importa. Nuestra propuesta está pensada para que cada persona, comunidad y organización pueda avanzar, disfrutar y ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Chippin







Personal






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Chippin in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Personal in 2026.
Incident History - Chippin (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Chippin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Personal (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Personal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Chippin

Personal
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.