Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店
VS
Wyndham Hotels & ResortsWyndham Hotels & Resorts
Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店

Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店

北京市复兴门外大街19号, 北京市, 北京市/西城区, 100045, CN

Last Update: 21/02/2026

View Profile
774/1000Fair

秉赋东方之礼 盛放西贵长安 DISCOVERY TANGLA Hotel Beijing “唐拉雅秀”一词源自唐古拉山脉的一个美丽传说,诠释着生命与自然的和谐.“唐古拉山接云天,三江源水养丰年”。耸立在海拔五千米高原上的唐古拉山雄壮圣洁,美丽富饶。冰雪融化并汇集成生生不息的三江源水,孕育了华夏灿烂文明和她的亿万儿女。成百上千年来,唐拉雅秀统领着绵延数百公里的唐古拉山脉。他巍巍昆仑守护着在这里居住的善良的人们,用潺潺流水灌溉着这片富饶辽阔的土地。 北京唐拉雅秀酒店位居北京西长安街,地处首都政务金融核心区域,距金融街一步之遥,距天安门...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

22 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, 07054, US

Last Update: 22/08/2026

View Profile
792/1000Fair

We are Wyndham Hotels & Resorts. We are the world’s largest hotel franchising company by the number of franchised properties, with approximately 8,300 hotels across approximately 100 countries on six continents. We operate a portfolio of 25 hotel brands: Whether choosi...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:10,254
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店

Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wyndham Hotels & Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店

Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 or Wyndham Hotels & Resorts ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 or Wyndham Hotels & Resorts ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tangla Hotel Beijing 北京唐拉雅秀酒店 and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-78147
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in ggml-org llama.cpp bec4772f6. The impacted element is the function deserialize_tensor of the file ggml/src/ggml-rpc/ggml-rpc.cpp of the component ggml-RPC Server. Performing a manipulation of the argument op/op_params results in deserialization. The attack may be initiated remotely. This vulnerability is distinct from CVE-2026-34159 (GHSA-j8rj-fmpv-wcxw, PR #20908), which only added a buffer==nullptr rejection in create_node() and does not validate op or op_params. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-23
UPDATED
Date2026-08-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-78145
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in CTFd up to 3.8.4. The affected element is the function _is_safe_url of the file CTFd/utils/validators/__init__.py. Such manipulation of the argument Next leads to open redirect. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The name of the patch is 5d8515842fd1ab2c3a9f2dde9ffca907aa334ea9. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-23
UPDATED
Date2026-08-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-78144
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in code-projects Barangay Resident Profiling Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /boarders.php of the component Boarder Management Module. Such manipulation of the argument ID leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-23
UPDATED
Date2026-08-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-78143
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in code-projects Barangay Resident Profiling Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file residents.php of the component Resident Search Functionality. This manipulation of the argument Search causes sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-23
UPDATED
Date2026-08-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-78142
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in code-projects Barangay Resident Profiling Management System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /archived_records.php of the component Restore/Delete. The manipulation of the argument resident_id results in authorization bypass. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-23
UPDATED
Date2026-08-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8