Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TangerineTangerine
VS
NordeaNordea
Tangerine

Tangerine

3389 Steeles Avenue East, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3S8, CA

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tangerine.ca
761/1000Fair

Welcome to Tangerine Bank! We’re a leading digital bank that helps Canadians live better financial lives by empowering them to make smarter decisions with their money. We offer banking that’s flexible, products and services that are innovative, fair fees and award-winni...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:1,541
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nordea

Nordea

Aleksanterinkatu 36 B, Helsinki, FI

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nordea.com
815/1000Good

We are a universal bank with a 200-year history of supporting and growing the Nordic economies – enabling dreams and aspirations for a greater good. Every day, we work to support our customers’ financial development, delivering best-in-class omnichannel customer experie...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:29,591
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tangerine

Tangerine

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nordea

Nordea

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tangerine in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nordea in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tangerine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tangerine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nordea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nordea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tangerine

Tangerine

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nordea

Nordea

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tangerine company and Nordea company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tangerine company and Nordea company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tangerine company and Nordea company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tangerine company and Nordea company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tangerine company and Nordea company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tangerine company and Nordea company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tangerine company and Nordea company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tangerine company and Nordea company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tangerine company and Nordea company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tangerine company and Nordea company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tangerine company and Nordea company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tangerine and Nordea, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tangerine and Nordea, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tangerine or Nordea ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tangerine or Nordea ?
Between Tangerine and Nordea, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tangerine and Nordea, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8