Comparison Overview
Talos Digital

Talos Digital
1101 Brickell Ave, Miami, Florida, 33131, US
Last Update: 25/11/2025
Talos works, because we’ve been there. We have experienced first-hand the need for vetted, multi-faceted talent that scales to project demands in a cost-effective way. So we created a company full of that kind of talent. Talent that can either staff a project f...

eClerx
29 Bank Street, Fort, 1st Floor, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400 023
Last Update: 02/04/2026
eClerx is a productized services company, bringing together people, technology and domain expertise to amplify business results. Our mission is to set the benchmark for client service and success in our industry. Our vision is to be the innovation partner of choice for ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Talos Digital







eClerx






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Talos Digital in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for eClerx in 2026.
Incident History - Talos Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Talos Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - eClerx (X = Date, Y = Severity)
eClerx cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Talos Digital

eClerx
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.