Comparison Overview

TalkTalk

VS

Vodafone Idea Limited

TalkTalk

Ordsall Lane, Salford, England, GB, M5 3
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://careers.talktalk.co.uk/

Welcome to the bolder, braver, electric green world of TalkTalk. We’ve got an updated look, but it’s not just a fresh coat of paint; it’s a new chapter aimed at delivering a better way to Wi-Fi. Part of our ongoing commitment to place customers at the heart of everything we do. Here at TalkTalk, we believe that diversity fuels innovation and success. We’re not your traditional 9-5. We’re a dynamic, flexible workplace. We only ask for skills, strengths, talents and potential – nothing more. Well, apart from being as excited as we are about where we’re going! Check out our careers site for more info.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 1,652
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Vodafone Idea Limited

Vodafone Idea Limited, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400030
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.myvi.in/

Vodafone Idea Limited is an Aditya Birla Group and Vodafone Group partnership. It is India’s leading telecom service provider. The Company provides pan India Voice and Data services across 2G, 3G and 4G platform. With the large spectrum portfolio to support the growing demand for data and voice, the company is committed to deliver delightful customer experiences and contribute towards creating a truly ‘Digital India’ by enabling millions of citizens to connect and build a better tomorrow. The Company is developing infrastructure to introduce newer and smarter technologies, making both retail and enterprise customers future ready with innovative offerings, conveniently accessible through an ecosystem of digital channels as well as extensive on-ground presence. The Company is listed on National Stock Exchange (NSE) and Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) in India.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 37,310
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/talktalk.jpeg
TalkTalk
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vodafone-idea-limited.jpeg
Vodafone Idea Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TalkTalk
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vodafone Idea Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TalkTalk in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

Vodafone Idea Limited has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — TalkTalk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TalkTalk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vodafone Idea Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vodafone Idea Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/talktalk.jpeg
TalkTalk
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2017
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Internal Employee Access
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2017
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2016
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vodafone-idea-limited.jpeg
Vodafone Idea Limited
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Vodafone Idea Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TalkTalk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TalkTalk company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Vodafone Idea Limited company.

In the current year, Vodafone Idea Limited company has reported more cyber incidents than TalkTalk company.

Neither Vodafone Idea Limited company nor TalkTalk company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

TalkTalk company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Vodafone Idea Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Vodafone Idea Limited company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while TalkTalk company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither TalkTalk company nor Vodafone Idea Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TalkTalk nor Vodafone Idea Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Vodafone Idea Limited company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TalkTalk company.

Vodafone Idea Limited company employs more people globally than TalkTalk company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither TalkTalk nor Vodafone Idea Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TalkTalk nor Vodafone Idea Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TalkTalk nor Vodafone Idea Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TalkTalk nor Vodafone Idea Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TalkTalk nor Vodafone Idea Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TalkTalk nor Vodafone Idea Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References