Comparison Overview

TalkTalk

VS

Motorola Solutions

TalkTalk

Ordsall Lane, Salford, England, GB, M5 3
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Welcome to the bolder, braver, electric green world of TalkTalk. We’ve got an updated look, but it’s not just a fresh coat of paint; it’s a new chapter aimed at delivering a better way to Wi-Fi. Part of our ongoing commitment to place customers at the heart of everything we do. Here at TalkTalk, we believe that diversity fuels innovation and success. We’re not your traditional 9-5. We’re a dynamic, flexible workplace. We only ask for skills, strengths, talents and potential – nothing more. Well, apart from being as excited as we are about where we’re going! Check out our careers site for more info.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 1,652
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Motorola Solutions

500 W. Monroe Street, Chicago, IL, US, 60661
Last Update: 2025-12-11

About Motorola Solutions | Solving for safer Safety and security are at the heart of everything we do at Motorola Solutions. We build and connect technologies to help protect people, property and places. Our solutions foster the collaboration that’s critical for safer communities, safer schools, safer hospitals, safer businesses, and ultimately, safer nations. Learn more about our commitment to innovating for a safer future for us all at www.motorolasolutions.com.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 25,588
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/talktalk.jpeg
TalkTalk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/motorolasolutions.jpeg
Motorola Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TalkTalk
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Motorola Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TalkTalk in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

Motorola Solutions has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — TalkTalk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TalkTalk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Motorola Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motorola Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/talktalk.jpeg
TalkTalk
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2017
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Internal Employee Access
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2017
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2016
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/motorolasolutions.jpeg
Motorola Solutions
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfiguration
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Motorola Solutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TalkTalk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TalkTalk company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Motorola Solutions company.

In the current year, Motorola Solutions company has reported more cyber incidents than TalkTalk company.

Neither Motorola Solutions company nor TalkTalk company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Motorola Solutions company and TalkTalk company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Motorola Solutions company nor TalkTalk company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TalkTalk company nor Motorola Solutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TalkTalk nor Motorola Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Motorola Solutions company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TalkTalk company.

Motorola Solutions company employs more people globally than TalkTalk company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither TalkTalk nor Motorola Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TalkTalk nor Motorola Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TalkTalk nor Motorola Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TalkTalk nor Motorola Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TalkTalk nor Motorola Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TalkTalk nor Motorola Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N