Comparison Overview

Take-Two Interactive

VS

Topgolf

Take-Two Interactive

110 W 44th St, New York, NY, US, 10036
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 800 and 849

Headquartered in New York City, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is a leading developer, publisher, and marketer of interactive entertainment for consumers around the globe. We develop and publish products principally through Rockstar Games, 2K, and Zynga. Our strategy is to create hit entertainment experiences, delivered on every platform relevant to our audience through a variety of sound business models. Our pillars - creativity, innovation, and efficiency - guide us as we strive to create the highest quality, most captivating experiences for our consumers. The Company’s common stock is publicly traded on NASDAQ under the symbol TTWO. For more corporate and product information please visit our website at http://www.take2games.com.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 1,100
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Topgolf

8750 N. Central Expressway, Dallas, Texas, US, 75231
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Topgolf is the ultimate instigator of play. Thanks to our 100+ venues around the globe, which are powered by industry-leading Toptracer technology, we're leading the charge of modern golf. We offer a variety of tech-driven games, a top-tier food and drink menu, space to host large events, and a vibe focused on more play for all. To learn more, plan an event, or make plans to come play around, visit topgolf.com.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 11,787
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/take-2-interactive-software-inc-.jpeg
Take-Two Interactive
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/topgolf.jpeg
Topgolf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Take-Two Interactive
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Topgolf
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Take-Two Interactive in 2025.

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Topgolf in 2025.

Incident History — Take-Two Interactive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Take-Two Interactive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Topgolf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Topgolf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/take-2-interactive-software-inc-.jpeg
Take-Two Interactive
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2019
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2019
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/topgolf.jpeg
Topgolf
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Take-Two Interactive company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Topgolf company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Take-Two Interactive company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Topgolf company has not reported any.

In the current year, Topgolf company and Take-Two Interactive company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Topgolf company nor Take-Two Interactive company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Take-Two Interactive company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Topgolf company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Topgolf company nor Take-Two Interactive company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Take-Two Interactive company nor Topgolf company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Take-Two Interactive nor Topgolf holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Take-Two Interactive company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Topgolf company.

Topgolf company employs more people globally than Take-Two Interactive company, reflecting its scale as a Entertainment Providers.

Neither Take-Two Interactive nor Topgolf holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Take-Two Interactive nor Topgolf holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Take-Two Interactive nor Topgolf holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Take-Two Interactive nor Topgolf holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Take-Two Interactive nor Topgolf holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Take-Two Interactive nor Topgolf holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H