Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TakataTakata
VS
Ford Motor CompanyFord Motor Company
Takata

Takata

2500 Takata Drive, Auburn Hills, 48326, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.takata.com
705/1000Moderate

Our dream is for a society with zero fatalities from traffic accidents, and our mission is to make this dream a reality. Our Business: Takata is one of the world's leading automotive safety system companies, supplying nearly all the world's major automakers with ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:3,608
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Ford Motor Company

Ford Motor Company

1 American Rd, Dearborn, Michigan, US, 48126

Last Update: 26/06/2026

View Profile
807/1000Good

We don't just make history -- we make the future. Ford put the world on wheels over a century ago, and our teams are re-inventing icons and creating groundbreaking connected and electric vehicles for the next century. We believe in serving our customers, our communities...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:152,499
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Takata

Takata

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ford Motor Company

Ford Motor Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Takata has 59.18% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ford Motor Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Takata (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Takata cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ford Motor Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ford Motor Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Takata

Takata

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TAK1771974510
Ford Motor Company

Ford Motor Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
FOR412071725

FAQ

Between Takata company and Ford Motor Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Takata company and Ford Motor Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Takata company and Ford Motor Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Takata company and Ford Motor Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Takata company and Ford Motor Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Takata company and Ford Motor Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Takata company and Ford Motor Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Takata company and Ford Motor Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Takata company and Ford Motor Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Takata company and Ford Motor Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Takata company and Ford Motor Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Takata and Ford Motor Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Takata and Ford Motor Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Takata or Ford Motor Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Takata or Ford Motor Company ?
Between Takata and Ford Motor Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Takata and Ford Motor Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA