Comparison Overview

Taj Hotels

VS

Hampton

Taj Hotels

9th Floor, Express Towers,, Mumbai, 400 021, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

Established in 1903, Taj is The Indian Hotels Company Limited’s (IHCL) iconic brand for the world’s most discerning travellers seeking luxury and authentic experiences. Taj has been rated as India’s Strongest Brand across all sectors for an unprecedented fourth time and also as the World’s Strongest Hotel Brand for the third consecutive year in 2024 by Brand Finance. From landmark city addresses to enchanting jungle safaris, and from idyllic resorts to authentic living Grand Palaces, each Taj hotel offers an unrivalled fusion of warm Indian hospitality, world-class service and modern luxury. Taj's unique portfolio comprises hotels across India, North America, United Kingdom, Africa, Middle East, Sri Lanka, Maldives and Nepal.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 24,292
Subsidiaries: 68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Hampton

7930 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 1100, McLean, 22102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

The Hampton brand, including Hampton Inn, Hampton Inn & Suites and Hampton by Hilton, is an award-winning leader in the upper-midscale hotel segment. With more than 2,700 properties in 32 countries globally, Hampton is part of Hilton Worldwide, the leading global hospitality company. All Hampton Hotels offer warm surroundings and a friendly service culture and personality, defined as “Hamptonality,” supported by its 100% Satisfaction Guarantee. High-quality accommodations, in-room conveniences and the latest technology, combined with numerous locations and consistent offerings, have made Hampton a leader in its segment and one of the fastest growing hotel brands. For more information please visit: www.hampton.com www.hamptonfranchise.com news.hampton.com www.hiltonworldwide.com/careers/ To connect with us on social please visit: www.facebook.com/hampton www.twitter.com/hampton www.youtube.com/hampton

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 11,302
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taj-hotels.jpeg
Taj Hotels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hampton.jpeg
Hampton
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Taj Hotels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hampton
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taj Hotels in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hampton in 2026.

Incident History — Taj Hotels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taj Hotels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hampton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hampton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taj-hotels.jpeg
Taj Hotels
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized AI Tool Usage, No-Code AI Agents, Third-Party AI Service Integration, Misconfigured Cloud Access (e.g., AWS), Zero-Click AI Exploits (e.g., 'Shadow Escape')
Motivation: Productivity Gains, Task Automation, Competitive Edge, Lack of Awareness About Risks, Financial Gain (for Cybercriminals)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Intellectual Property Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hampton.jpeg
Hampton
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: denial-of-service malware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Point-of-Sale System
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Taj Hotels company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hampton company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Taj Hotels company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Hampton company.

In the current year, Hampton company and Taj Hotels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Taj Hotels company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Hampton company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Hampton company and Taj Hotels company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Taj Hotels company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Hampton company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Taj Hotels company nor Hampton company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Taj Hotels nor Hampton holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Taj Hotels company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hampton company.

Taj Hotels company employs more people globally than Hampton company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Taj Hotels nor Hampton holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Taj Hotels nor Hampton holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Taj Hotels nor Hampton holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Taj Hotels nor Hampton holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Taj Hotels nor Hampton holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Taj Hotels nor Hampton holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.