Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

台灣特洛奇資訊台灣特洛奇資訊
VS
IndeedIndeed
台灣特洛奇資訊

台灣特洛奇資訊

新北市中和區中正路920號, 新北市, 235, TW

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.telogy.com.tw/
759/1000Fair

特洛奇深耕資安市場多年,在網路資安以及環境資安控管方面,特洛奇擁有多樣化的產品,能針對客戶需求提出彈性化的解決方案,協助客戶找出各種威脅,完整資安防護環境。產品及服務內容涵蓋以下: 網路流量側錄與保全 網路安全與流量頻寬可視/可控化 資安服務(弱點掃描、滲透測試、紅隊演練) 資安檢測工具(DDOS檢測、效能檢測、弱點掃描、模糊測試、源碼檢測) 端點防護與資產管理查核系統 特洛奇是領先全球、服務可靠的資安解決方案供應商,不僅幫助服務提供商改善網路的效能,並協助企業從複雜的IT基礎設備中獲得更好的效益。特洛奇的客戶涵蓋了電信業與網路服務...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Indeed

Indeed

6433 Champion Grandview Way, Bldgs I & II, Austin, Texas, US, 78750

Last Update: 22/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.Indeed.com
812/1000Good

More people get jobs on Indeed than anywhere else. As the world’s #1 job site (Comscore, Total Visits, March 2026), Indeed is a global hiring platform connecting over 685 million Job Seeker Profiles with 3.5 million employers across more than 60 countries. Indeed uses A...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:20,209
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
台灣特洛奇資訊

台灣特洛奇資訊

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Indeed

Indeed

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 台灣特洛奇資訊 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indeed in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 台灣特洛奇資訊 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

台灣特洛奇資訊 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Indeed (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indeed cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
台灣特洛奇資訊

台灣特洛奇資訊

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TAI1192311102125
Indeed

Indeed

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Indeed company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Indeed company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Indeed company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Indeed company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Indeed company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Indeed company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Indeed company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Indeed company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Indeed company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Indeed company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Indeed company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 and Indeed, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 and Indeed, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 台灣特洛奇資訊 or Indeed ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 台灣特洛奇資訊 or Indeed ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 and Indeed, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 and Indeed, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89322
SUMMARY

Vault and Vault Enterprise did not consistently evaluate ACL policies against the canonical form of resource and policy names. This may allow an authenticated user with delegated permissions to bypass an explicit deny restriction and access a protected resource or assign a denied policy, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-89322) is fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.1.2, and Vault Enterprise 2.1.2, 1.21.12, 1.20.17, and 1.19.23.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-107314
SUMMARY

pgjdbc, the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, versions 42.7.11 through 42.7.13 enforce no restriction when the requireAuth connection property excludes all six authentication methods the driver knows, for example requireAuth=!password,!md5,!gss,!sspi,!scram-sha-256,!none. The driver then accepts any method the server asks for, including cleartext password authentication. A value without a method in it, such as requireAuth=, (a single comma), is affected the same way. An attacker positioned between the application and its server can ask for cleartext password authentication and receive the database password. A positive list such as requireAuth=scram-sha-256, and a partial exclusion such as requireAuth=!password,!md5, are enforced correctly. The property has no default value, so a deployment that does not set it is not affected. 42.7.14 fixes the problem: such a connection is refused with SQLState 08004, and a value without a method in it is rejected as invalid.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107285
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, a proxied ws request is carried through CONNECT, but NettyRequestFactory.newNettyRequest and requestUri decide whether to attach proxy authentication and an absolute-form target only from whether the URI is secure. Because ws is not marked secure, the tunneled WebSocket upgrade sent to the origin includes the proxy's Proxy-Authorization value. Basic credentials are directly recoverable and Digest responses can be replayed or cracked offline. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107284
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, WebSocketHandler.upgrade aborts a handshake whose Sec-WebSocket-Accept value is missing or invalid but continues into pipeline installation and onOpen delivery. Frames coalesced with the invalid 101 response can be decoded and delivered from a peer that did not prove the handshake, although the request future fails and the channel closes. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107283
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, Realm.Builder generates the HTTP Digest client nonce with ThreadLocalRandom rather than a cryptographically secure random source. Digest relies on an unpredictable cnonce to resist chosen-plaintext and credential precomputation attacks, so an observer able to infer generator state can reduce the protection of the authentication exchange. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2