Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

台灣特洛奇資訊台灣特洛奇資訊
VS
Akamai TechnologiesAkamai Technologies
台灣特洛奇資訊

台灣特洛奇資訊

新北市中和區中正路920號, 新北市, 235, TW

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.telogy.com.tw/
759/1000Fair

特洛奇深耕資安市場多年,在網路資安以及環境資安控管方面,特洛奇擁有多樣化的產品,能針對客戶需求提出彈性化的解決方案,協助客戶找出各種威脅,完整資安防護環境。產品及服務內容涵蓋以下: 網路流量側錄與保全 網路安全與流量頻寬可視/可控化 資安服務(弱點掃描、滲透測試、紅隊演練) 資安檢測工具(DDOS檢測、效能檢測、弱點掃描、模糊測試、源碼檢測) 端點防護與資產管理查核系統 特洛奇是領先全球、服務可靠的資安解決方案供應商,不僅幫助服務提供商改善網路的效能,並協助企業從複雜的IT基礎設備中獲得更好的效益。特洛奇的客戶涵蓋了電信業與網路服務...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

8 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, US, 02142

Last Update: 28/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.akamai.com
732/1000Moderate

At Akamai, we make life better for billions of people, billions of times a day. Every day, billions of people around the world connect with their favorite brands to shop online, play the latest video games, log into mobile banking apps, learn remotely, share videos wi...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,327
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
台灣特洛奇資訊

台灣特洛奇資訊

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 台灣特洛奇資訊 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Akamai Technologies has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - 台灣特洛奇資訊 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

台灣特洛奇資訊 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Akamai Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Akamai Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
台灣特洛奇資訊

台灣特洛奇資訊

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TAI1192311102125
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TOLTELAKA1777389934
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AKA1776515140
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
UNIAKA1773995078

FAQ

Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Akamai Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Akamai Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 and Akamai Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 and Akamai Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 台灣特洛奇資訊 or Akamai Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 台灣特洛奇資訊 or Akamai Technologies ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 and Akamai Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 台灣特洛奇資訊 and Akamai Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59858
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0735, the C omni-completion script in runtime/autoload/ccomplete.vim interpolates the typeref: or typename: extension field of a tags entry, without escaping, into a :vimgrep pattern that is run through :execute. Because :vimgrep honors the bar as a command separator, a crafted tag field can close the search pattern and append an arbitrary Ex command; opening a hostile .c file whose project tags file contains such an entry and invoking C omni-completion runs that command as the editing user. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0735.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59857
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0725, the single-byte branch of spell_soundfold_sal() in src/spell.c translates a word through a spell file's SAL sound-folding rules into a caller-owned result buffer, but its result writes are guarded with reslen < MAXWLEN, allowing reslen to reach MAXWLEN before res[reslen] = NUL writes one byte past the end of the MAXWLEN-element stack buffer. A boundary-length word passed to soundfold(), or reached via sound-based spell suggestion while a SAL-based spell language is active under a non-multibyte 8-bit encoding, can corrupt the eval_soundfold() stack frame and crash the editor. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0725.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59856
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0736, the PHP omni-completion script in runtime/autoload/phpcomplete.vim interpolates a class or trait name, taken from the contents of the edited buffer, into a search() pattern that is run via win_execute() without escaping. A name containing a single quote can terminate the search() string argument early, and because the bar is honored as an Ex command separator, the remainder of the name is run as Ex commands; via the :! command this allows arbitrary operating-system command execution when a victim opens a crafted PHP file and invokes omni-completion. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0736.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59855
SUMMARY

SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, Asset.render in app/src/asset/index.ts interpolates the unsanitized this.path value into HTML assigned to innerHTML, allowing a crafted asset link containing a double quote to break out of the src attribute, inject an event handler, and execute JavaScript that can run OS commands in the Electron renderer. This issue is fixed in versions 3.7.1-alpha.2 and 3.7.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59854
SUMMARY

SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, POST /api/file/globalCopyFiles accepts attacker-supplied absolute source paths and relies on util.IsSensitivePath in kernel/util/path.go, whose denylist misses common home-directory credential files such as .git-credentials, .netrc, .pgpass, .kube/config, .docker/config.json, and .gnupg, allowing an authenticated administrator or API-token user to copy those files into the workspace and exfiltrate them through the file API. This issue is fixed in versions 3.7.1-alpha.2 and 3.7.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2