Comparison Overview

TAFE NSW

VS

Chicago Public Schools

TAFE NSW

Cnr Harris St & Mary Ann St, Ultimo, New South Wales, 2007, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tafensw.edu.au/

TAFE NSW is one of Australia's leading vocational education and training provider with over 100 years of experience. It caters for students at the local level, the national level and the international level. TAFE NSW has over 130 locations across the state. Through a series of forums, TAFE NSW works hard to ensure that it is meeting the expectations of the community and the industry in each local area. RTO: 90003

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 12,883
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Chicago Public Schools

42 West Madison Street, Chicago, IL, US, 60602
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749
http://www.cps.edu

Chicago Public Schools is looking for teachers, leaders, and non-instructional staff to transform the face of urban education. We are a team of passionate, committed, and talented professionals who believe that every CPS student will graduate prepared for success in college, career, and life. Come join us in making CPS a model for public school districts throughout the nation. CPS is the third largest school district in the United States with more than 600 schools providing education to over 340,000 children.

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 36,826
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tafe-nsw.jpeg
TAFE NSW
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-public-schools.jpeg
Chicago Public Schools
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TAFE NSW
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chicago Public Schools
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TAFE NSW in 2025.

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Public Schools in 2025.

Incident History — TAFE NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TAFE NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chicago Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tafe-nsw.jpeg
TAFE NSW
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Payroll System Breach
Motivation: Financial Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-public-schools.jpeg
Chicago Public Schools
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

TAFE NSW company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chicago Public Schools company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TAFE NSW and Chicago Public Schools have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Chicago Public Schools company and TAFE NSW company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Chicago Public Schools company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while TAFE NSW company has not reported such incidents publicly.

TAFE NSW company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Chicago Public Schools company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Chicago Public Schools company nor TAFE NSW company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TAFE NSW company nor Chicago Public Schools company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TAFE NSW nor Chicago Public Schools holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TAFE NSW company nor Chicago Public Schools company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chicago Public Schools company employs more people globally than TAFE NSW company, reflecting its scale as a Education Administration Programs.

Neither TAFE NSW nor Chicago Public Schools holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TAFE NSW nor Chicago Public Schools holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TAFE NSW nor Chicago Public Schools holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TAFE NSW nor Chicago Public Schools holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TAFE NSW nor Chicago Public Schools holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TAFE NSW nor Chicago Public Schools holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References