Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Taco Bell ONEUROPE                 (UK & Europe)Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe)
VS
Jack in the BoxJack in the Box
Taco Bell ONEUROPE                 (UK & Europe)

Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe)

N/A

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tacobell.co.uk/
762/1000Fair

Born and raised in California since 1962, Taco Bell has journeyed from being a local favourite for Crunchy Tacos on the West Coast to establishing itself as a global phenomenon. With a remarkable presence spanning over 8,200 restaurants, 350 franchise organizations, and...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:86
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Jack in the Box

Jack in the Box

9357 Spectrum Center Blvd, San Diego, California, US, 92123

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jackinthebox.com
760/1000Fair

Jack in the Box has always been the place for those who live outside the box. Where you can try new things and order what you want when you want it. Now, let’s get to the facts! Did you know Jack in the Box was founded on February 21, 1951, by a businessman named Robert...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:20,918
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Taco Bell ONEUROPE                 (UK & Europe)

Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Jack in the Box

Jack in the Box

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jack in the Box in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Jack in the Box (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jack in the Box cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Taco Bell ONEUROPE                 (UK & Europe)

Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Jack in the Box

Jack in the Box

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) company and Jack in the Box company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) company and Jack in the Box company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) company and Jack in the Box company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) company and Jack in the Box company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) company and Jack in the Box company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) company and Jack in the Box company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) company and Jack in the Box company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) company and Jack in the Box company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) company and Jack in the Box company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) company and Jack in the Box company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) company and Jack in the Box company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) and Jack in the Box, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) and Jack in the Box, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) or Jack in the Box ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) or Jack in the Box ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) and Jack in the Box, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Taco Bell ONEUROPE (UK & Europe) and Jack in the Box, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-111865
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-111934
SUMMARY

Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-111933
SUMMARY

Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-111932
SUMMARY

Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-111931
SUMMARY

Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8