Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tabung HajiTabung Haji
VS
NN GroupNN Group
Tabung Haji

Tabung Haji

201 Jalan Tun Razak, Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, MY, 50400

Last Update: 12/10/2026

View Profile
745/1000Moderate

Lembaga Tabung Haji (TH) is an Islamic institution that continuously strives to provide various facilities which are comprehensive and systematic for the welfare of Malaysian Hajj Pilgrims. Besides halal savings and efficient hajj operations management, TH also manages ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:1,866
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
NN Group

NN Group

Schenkkade 65, Den Haag, 2595, NL

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nn-group.com
799/1000Fair

NN Group is an international financial services company, active in 10 countries, with a strong presence in a number of European countries and Japan. We are rooted in the Netherlands and have a rich history spanning 180 years. With our 16,000 colleagues, NN Group provid...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:24,414
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tabung Haji

Tabung Haji

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NN Group

NN Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Tabung Haji has 42.53% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NN Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tabung Haji (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tabung Haji cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NN Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NN Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tabung Haji

Tabung Haji

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TAB1791801200
NN Group

NN Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tabung Haji company and NN Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tabung Haji company and NN Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tabung Haji company and NN Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tabung Haji company and NN Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tabung Haji company and NN Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tabung Haji company and NN Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tabung Haji company and NN Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tabung Haji company and NN Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tabung Haji company and NN Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tabung Haji company and NN Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tabung Haji company and NN Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tabung Haji and NN Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tabung Haji and NN Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tabung Haji or NN Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tabung Haji or NN Group ?
Between Tabung Haji and NN Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tabung Haji and NN Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9