Comparison Overview
TÜV NORD GROUP

TÜV NORD GROUP
Am TÜV 1, Hannover, 30519, DE
Last Update: 29/03/2026
With over 10,000 employees in more than 70 countries in Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas, TÜV NORD GROUP is actively committed to its national and international customers. Its broad consulting, service and inspection portfolio encompasses both specific individual t...

Australia Post
111 Bourke St, Melbourne, 3000, AU
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Connecting businesses with consumers is the heart of commercial prosperity and the cornerstone of Australia Post's commitment to Australian businesses. As connectivity transforms our lives, Australia Post is evolving to meet the future needs of businesses by providing t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

TÜV NORD GROUP







Australia Post






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TÜV NORD GROUP in 2026.
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Australia Post in 2026.
Incident History - TÜV NORD GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TÜV NORD GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Australia Post (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Australia Post cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

TÜV NORD GROUP

Australia Post
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.