Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

T-Systems Nederland B.V.T-Systems Nederland B.V.
VS
Amazon Web Services (AWS)Amazon Web Services (AWS)
T-Systems Nederland B.V.

T-Systems Nederland B.V.

Van Deventerlaan 31-51, Utrecht, 3528 AG, NL

Last Update: 20/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.t-systems.nl
751/1000Fair

Want to know us better? Subscribe for the T-Systems innovation & Tech Day 2025: https://info.t-systems.nl/innovation_and_tech_day_2025 T-Systems is een van Europa’s grootste ICT-dienstverleners. Als onderdeel van Deutsche Telekom, combineren we lokale klantfocus met in...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:156
Subsidiaries:66
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

410 Terry Ave N, Seattle, 98019, US

Last Update: 06/08/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://aws.amazon.com
559/1000Very Poor

Launched in 2006, Amazon Web Services (AWS) began exposing key infrastructure services to businesses in the form of web services -- now widely known as cloud computing. The ultimate benefit of cloud computing, and AWS, is the ability to leverage a new business model and...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:148,035
Subsidiaries:95
12-month incidents
23
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
T-Systems Nederland B.V.

T-Systems Nederland B.V.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for T-Systems Nederland B.V. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) has 2111.54% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - T-Systems Nederland B.V. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T-Systems Nederland B.V. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Amazon Web Services (AWS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
T-Systems Nederland B.V.

T-Systems Nederland B.V.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AMASAL1786012333
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
RUB1785673407
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMA1782541446

FAQ

Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - T-Systems Nederland B.V. or Amazon Web Services (AWS) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - T-Systems Nederland B.V. or Amazon Web Services (AWS) ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between T-Systems Nederland B.V. and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA