Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

T-Systems Hungary Ltd.T-Systems Hungary Ltd.
VS
Infinite Computer SolutionsInfinite Computer Solutions
T-Systems Hungary Ltd.

T-Systems Hungary Ltd.

Könyves Kálmán körút 36, Budapest, 1097, HU

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.t-systems.hu/
828/1000Good

T-Systems Hungary is the largest Hungarian service provider that can cover the entire range of ICT technologies. The company in the 100 percent ownership of Magyar Telekom has a clientele comprising large corporations and public sector institutions, to whom they supply ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:441
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Infinite Computer Solutions

Infinite Computer Solutions

Tower Oaks Blvd, #700, Rockville, Maryland, US, 20852

Last Update: 17/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.infinite.com/
759/1000Fair

Infinite is a global leader in technology modernization, next-gen IT services and solutions, and digital engineering, with over two decades of experience helping clients turn digital transformation into business value. Leveraging an AI-first approach, we combine leading...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:13,638
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
T-Systems Hungary Ltd.

T-Systems Hungary Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Infinite Computer Solutions

Infinite Computer Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for T-Systems Hungary Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Infinite Computer Solutions has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - T-Systems Hungary Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T-Systems Hungary Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Infinite Computer Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infinite Computer Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
T-Systems Hungary Ltd.

T-Systems Hungary Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Infinite Computer Solutions

Infinite Computer Solutions

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CITINF1781735198

FAQ

Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. and Infinite Computer Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. and Infinite Computer Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - T-Systems Hungary Ltd. or Infinite Computer Solutions ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - T-Systems Hungary Ltd. or Infinite Computer Solutions ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. and Infinite Computer Solutions, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. and Infinite Computer Solutions, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA