Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

T-Systems Hungary Ltd.T-Systems Hungary Ltd.
VS
IBMIBM
T-Systems Hungary Ltd.

T-Systems Hungary Ltd.

Könyves Kálmán körút 36, Budapest, 1097, HU

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.t-systems.hu/
828/1000Good

T-Systems Hungary is the largest Hungarian service provider that can cover the entire range of ICT technologies. The company in the 100 percent ownership of Magyar Telekom has a clientele comprising large corporations and public sector institutions, to whom they supply ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:441
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IBM

IBM

International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US

Last Update: 29/07/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.ibm.com
538/1000Critical

At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and co...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:336,062
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
11
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
T-Systems Hungary Ltd.

T-Systems Hungary Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IBM

IBM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for T-Systems Hungary Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

IBM has 380.77% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - T-Systems Hungary Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T-Systems Hungary Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
T-Systems Hungary Ltd.

T-Systems Hungary Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IBM

IBM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBM1785321873
🔒 Incident : Breach
ATTIBM1781168591
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ANTARCFLOIBM1776659058

FAQ

Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and IBM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and IBM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and IBM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and IBM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. company and IBM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - T-Systems Hungary Ltd. or IBM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - T-Systems Hungary Ltd. or IBM ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. and IBM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between T-Systems Hungary Ltd. and IBM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1