Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd.T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd.
VS
Persistent SystemsPersistent Systems
T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd.

T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd.

Panchshil Business Park, Tower A, Balewadi High Street, , Pune, Maharashra, 4110045, IN

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
765/1000Fair

T-Systems Information and Communication Technology India Private Limited (“TSIN”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of T-Systems International GmbH and has a presence in Pune, Bangalore, and Nagpur with 4000+ employees providing services to group customers. With around 27,0...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:3,262
Subsidiaries:64
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Persistent Systems

Persistent Systems

Bhageerath, 402 E, Senapati Bapat Road, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411016

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.persistent.com
776/1000Fair

We are an AI-led, platform-driven Digital Engineering and Enterprise Modernization partner, combining deep technical expertise and industry experience to help our clients anticipate what’s next. Our offerings and proven solutions create a unique competitive advantage fo...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:27,562
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd.

T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Persistent Systems

Persistent Systems

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Persistent Systems in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Persistent Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Persistent Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd.

T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Persistent Systems

Persistent Systems

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. company and Persistent Systems company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. company and Persistent Systems company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. company and Persistent Systems company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. company and Persistent Systems company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. company and Persistent Systems company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. and Persistent Systems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. and Persistent Systems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. or Persistent Systems ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. or Persistent Systems ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. and Persistent Systems, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. and Persistent Systems, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8