Comparison Overview
T-Mobile

T-Mobile
12920 SE 38th St, Bellevue, WA, US, 98006
Last Update: 03/07/2026
As the supercharged Un-carrier, T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMUS) is powered by an award-winning 5G network that connects more people, in more places, than ever before. With T-Mobile’s unique value proposition of best network, best value, and best experiences, the Un-car...

Ericsson
Torshamnsgatan 21, Kista, Stockholm, SE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The future of mobile isn’t on the horizon, it’s happening now. At Ericsson, we’re building the foundation for an open network ecosystem where industries, developers, and enterprises thrive. The convergence of 5G, AI, cloud, and network APIs isn’t just a technological s...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

T-Mobile







Ericsson






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
T-Mobile has 58.73% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
Ericsson has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - T-Mobile (X = Date, Y = Severity)
T-Mobile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ericsson (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ericsson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

T-Mobile

Ericsson
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.