Comparison Overview
T-MOB
T-MOB
Capital Federal, 1437, AR
Last Update: 16/03/2026
We Create Mobile Business With Global Strength More than 20 years experience in telecommunications and online services. Content Creation. We produce, distribute and monetize high quality content on the most important carriers and platforms. Mobile Monetization. We provi...
Indra
Avda. Bruselas, 35, Madrid, 28108, ES
Last Update: 01/07/2026
Indra Group (https://www.indragroup.com/) is the foremost Spanish multinational and one of the leading European companies that focus on defence and advanced technologies. It stands at the forefront of the defence, space, air traffic management, mobility, and Information...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
T-MOB
Indra
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for T-MOB in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Indra has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - T-MOB (X = Date, Y = Severity)
T-MOB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Indra (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Indra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
T-MOB
Indra
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Glance through 32.0.0, the /v2/tasks API accepts type=import tasks that bypass import_filtering_opts, allowing an admin to fetch internal URLs from the Glance service network (aka SSRF), as long as https:// or http:// is used. This API has been available only to admins since Xena, and it has been deprecated for several releases.
SPIP before 4.4.20 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, as exploited in the wild in August 2026. This is related to incorrect identification of <?php blocks, and var_export's mishandling of certain cases such as presence of a '<' character.
Path traversal in apport-unpack in Canonical Apport before 2.36.0, 2.34.2, and 2.28.4 on Linux allows an attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the executing user via an attacker controlled key names in crash report files.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill PDMLink and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.
A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.